Connecting the world and beyond

Affordability

​​​​ ​​Affordability

Overview

Defining price versus affordability

Standardized price baskets can be used to compare prices between operators and/or countries. Prices can strongly impact the profitability of mobile operators, and their ability to survive, upgrade and reinvest in networks. Prices for initial service launches may be high ("premium pricing"), but usually fall as services are rolled out across larger subscriber bases, sometimes due to "economies of scale" (a proportionate saving in costs gained by an increased level of production) or "predatory pricing" (setting extremely low prices in an attempt to eliminate the competition and establish a monopoly). Operators may also apply temporary promotions to attract customers.

The "price" of telecom/ICT services is often cited as a barrier to using telecom services, but what really matters is the "affordability" or the extent to which ICT services are financially accessible, relative to consumer income. Prices can be expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) per capita to show prices relative to the size of the economy of each country, thus pointing to the affordability of each ICT service at country level.

Such national averages may not indicate that ICT services are affordable for poorer social classes, or any particular household or individual. Beyond national averages, taking into consideration the distribution of income or consumption in a country may provide further insights into affordability – such as how much ICT services cost relative to the income of the lowest-earning 40 per cent of the population. 

Baskets provide a helpful standard benchmark for comparisons, but they have some drawbacks. There is a greater variety of subscription packages available to consumers and while they reflect a global compromise, consumption patterns in specific markets may be different.

The ITU Expert Group on Telecommunication/ICT Indicators (EGTI) maintains a set of baskets that represent the variety of consumption patterns in both lower- and higher-income economies around the world. EGTI revises the basket definitions on a regular basis to follow global market dynamics. According to the latest methodology, as of 2025, the baskets include a fixed broadband, a mobile broadband data-only as well as low- and high-consumption data and voice baskets.

For affordability, ITU monitors price trends for the four baskets at the global, regional and country level. While overall the basket prices are declining, there is still some countries where broadband access is relatively unaffordable, costing above 10per cent of GNI per capita.  ​ 

Challenges


The telecom/ICT sector is highly complex, with many converged services. Historically, prices used to be paid and settled on the basis of per minute charges or tariffs. Many operators, however, have moved to Internet Protocol (IP)-based networks and now price their communication services on a "flat-rate" basis, for a certain amount of data. This relates to the consumption of services (e.g. movies, online games) using large amounts of data.

The bundling of services, and the introduction of personalized offers presents further challenges for monitoring and benchmarking prices and affordability, as these operator practices hamper the comparison of services at national and international levels.

In addition to the affordability of ICT services, the high relative price of ICT-enabled devices often represents an important barrier to connectivity. Currently, there is no internationally established standard for benchmarking device affordability.

Comparable data is needed to assess the impacts of prices on access and consumer welfare and to enable regulators and consumers to compare prices and identify trends. ITU works closely with other regional and international bodies (including the UN, Eurostat, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development as well as country experts on developing international definitions, standards and methodologies for telecommunication/ICT data.

Opportunities​


Falling prices have been linked to increased subscription rates and greater usage of ICT services. However, this relationship is only observable below a certain threshold. Different stakeholders have a different role to play.

Telecom operators have a vital role in defining, revising and pricing telecom packages for consumers – in terms of monthly subscription prices or prices per traffic. Historically, there is strong evidence to suggest that prices in mobile markets generally fell, following the introduction of strong and effective competition with alternative mobile operators.

ICT regulators, in addition to fostering competition in markets, often set reference interconnection offers, setting recommended or ceiling interconnection prices between operators. They often also set national benchmark prices and monitor markets through regular market surveys, to try and define, and ensure "fair" and affordable prices for consumers, against fair returns for operators, so they can continue to invest and upgrade mobile networks. Ultimately,  operators must strike a balance between prices and profitability and infrastructure reinvestment. 

Governments (ministries and regulators) can also play a strong advocacy role, by emphasizing the importance of cheaper telecom services at the national level (e.g. through their Digital Agenda or other statement of policy). They can also convene dialogues and national consultations to define national priorities for the rollout of cheaper and more affordable digital infrastructure among different stakeholders.


ITU’s role

Last update: March 2026.