Page 58 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 5 – Internet of Everything
P. 58

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 5





                                                                                           256 nodes
                                                                              128 filters
                                32 filters               64 filters


                                                                                                    15 nodes




                        Conv2D       MaxPool2D  Conv2D  MaxPool2D  Conv2D  MaxPool2D         Fully   Softmax
                       3x3 Kernel    2x2 Kernel  3x3 Kernel  2x2 Kernel  3x3 Kernel 2x2 Kernel  Connected   Output Layer
                                                                                            Layer

          Fig. 5 – CNN architecture formed of three convolution and pooling layer pairs followed by a fully connected and a softmax output layer. The number
          of  ilters increase as data travels deep into the model to capture a widening variety of features better. Softmax output layer gives a set of predictions
          resolving the maximum likelihood of the signals class reference. The one with the highest probability is predicted by the model to be the class of the
          signal.

          additional SNR levels ranging from 0 dB to 20 dB for time‑   Table 3 – Optimum set of hyperparameters for models trained on time‑
                                                               series images.
          series signal‑based classi ication, and seven different ad‑
          ditional  SNR  levels  ranging  from  −10  dB  to  20  dB  for
                                                                    SNR     Optimizer  Batch   Validation
          spectrogram‑based  classi ication,  with  SNR  increments
                                                                    (dB)               size    accuracy (%)
          of  5  dB  in  both  cases.  To  train  the  models,  we  created
          100 images for each class and for each unique SNR trun‑
                                                                    30      SGD        4       99.7
          cation  threshold  pairs  following  the  noising  procedure
                                                                    20      Adagrad    4       96.5
          described  in  Section  3.2  and  the  denoising  procedure
                                                                    10      Nadam      16      81.6
          (for  spectrogram  images  only)  described  in  Section  4.2.
                                                                    5       Nadam      1       65.3
          Throughout  the  study,  we  created  more  than  100  data
                                                                    0       Adagrad    1       50.1
          sets,  each having 1500 images (15 classes with 100 im‑
          ages each).  A Hanning window function of size 128 with
          16  overlap  samples  is  used  while  creating  the  spectro‑   5.1  Comments on environmental interference
          grams.
                                                               All the signals used in this study are recorded for a wide
          Before  feeding  the  CNN,  we  crop  the  images  appropri‑
                                                               range of frequencies, i.e., 0−1   0 GHz, as illustrated by the
          ately to get rid of the unnecessary parts of the images and
                                                               spectrogram  in  Fig.  3(a).  The   irst  observation  that  can
          reduce the  ile sizes, which helps speed up the converg‑
                                                               be  made  in  there  is  that  the  frequency  utilization  sig‑
          ing of the CNN models.  Resulting spectrogram and time‑
                                                               ni icantly  decreases  above  roughly  7  GHz,  which  is  be‑
          series signal images have the sizes of (90 × 385 × 3) and
                                                               cause  there  is  no  wireless  transmission  for  that
          (779 × 769 × 1), respectively. In this work, we used brute
                                                               frequency range near the locations where we conducted
          force searching to optimize CNN model parameters.  We
                                                               the  measurements.  One  can  also  notice  the  high  color
          utilized the NC State University HPC (High Performance
                                                               intensity  at  the  GSM  band  around  1800  MHz.  Since  all  of
          Computing) Facility to run parallel simulations for differ‑
                                                               the   drone   controllers   considered   in   this   study
          ent sets of hyperparameters to  ind the optimum param‑   transmit  in  the  2.4  GHz  ISM  band,  notable  densities  in
          eter set.
                                                               other  bands  on  spectrograms  have  no  effect  on
                                                               the  model  accuracy.  However,  the  2.4  GHz  band  is  also
          Note that, after rigorous simulations, the optimum activa‑
                                                               used heavily  by  Wi‑Fi  and  Bluetooth  transmitters.  In
          tion function came up to be ReLu for all hyperparameter
                                                               case Wi‑Fi  and/or  Bluetooth  signals  are  received,
          combinations.  We also used single stride in both direc‑
                                                               our  proposed  model  applies  a  multistage  detection
          tions on images with no dilation, and valid padding for all
                                                               system described in [26] to detect those type of signals
          models created regardless of SNR level and type of data.
                                                               and  ilter them out.
          Remaining details of the models are given in Fig. 5,  and
          Table 3 and Table 4.
                                                               Raw  data  used  in  this  work  have  been  gathered
          In  the  rest  of  this  section,  we  will   irst  give  consider‑   in  an  indoor   environment   where   Wi‑Fi   and
          ations  about  the  environmental  interference  issues  and   Bluetooth  signals  could   exist.   A   24   dBi   gain
          then present the classi ication results for the time‑series   directional  antenna  has  been  used  to  capture  the
          images  and  spectrogram  images.  Subsequently,  we  will   signals.   It  is  known  that  IEEE   802.11  standards
          discuss  the  relation  between  classi ication  accuracy  and   family   routers   implement Carrier‑Sense Multiple
          training set size and,  inally, share the results for out‑of‑
            classif        proposed
          model.
        46                                   © International Telecommunication Union, 2021
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63