Page 172 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2021

2021 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference

The results obtained thus far can be considered as [2] C. Donalek, S. G. Djorgovski, A. Cioc, A. Wang, J.
preliminary results. We believe they are robust enough to Zhang, E. Lawler, S. Yeh, A. Mahabal, M. Graham,
point in the right direction and be used in hypothesis A. Drake, S. Davidoff, J.S. Norris, & G. Longo,
formulation, but not statistically significant to draw “Immersive and collaborative data visualization
definitive conclusions. using virtual reality platforms.” Proceedings - 2014
IEEE International Conference on Big Data, IEEE
In terms of responsiveness, participants spent less time Big Data, 2014.
making decisions posed through HCE questions in Aroaro https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2014.7004282 .
than the alternative. Further, the quality of decisions,
measured by scores on the answers provided, was higher [3] A. Febretti, A. Nishimoto, T. Thigpen, J. Talandis,
when the participants experienced Aroaro’s VR environment L. Long, J. D. Pirtle, T. Peterka, A. Verlo, M. Brown,
than their using the alternative. This result is less obvious for D. Plepys, and others, “CAVE2: a hybrid reality
LCE questions and more appreciable for HCE questions. environment for immersive simulation and
Participants seemed to have performed better on Gephi when information analysis,” in Proceedings IS&T / SPIE
they worked first in Aroaro. However, when Gephi was the Electronic Imaging, vol. 8649, pp. 864903.1–12.
first platform used, participants in Aroaro had lower SPIE, 2013.
performance compared to when Aroaro was first used.
[4] A. Irlitti, S. Von Itzstein, L. Alem, and B. Thomas,
Results cannot yet deliver hard quantitative evidence of “Tangible interaction techniques to support
superior performance of one visualization tool over the other. asynchronous collaboration”, in 2013 IEEE Interna-
However, it is encouraging to observe most users report our tional Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
platform is easier to use than the alternative. Also, it is noted (ISMAR), pp. 1–6, 2013.
that as users could explore the virtual environment and feel
comfortable discovering its features, they also get more [5] M. Cordeil, T. Dwyer, K. Klein, B. Laha, K. Marriott
curious about the object of visualization. The latter suggests and B. H. Thomas, "Immersive Collaborative
what is reported in earlier immersive analytics experiments Analysis of Network Connectivity: CAVE-style or
that the richness of the environment invites exploration. Head-Mounted Display?" in IEEE Transactions on
Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 23, no. 1,
Next steps will deliver reports on a quantitative assessment pp. 441-450, Jan. 2017, doi:10.1109/
of the answers provided by lab subjects, which will allow us TVCG.2016.2599107.
to effectuate a comparison between 3D data visualization on
a 2D flat screen and a totally immersive system. Finding [6] M. Cordeil, A. Cunningham, T. Dwyer, B. H.
whether, where and how immersive virtual reality Thomas and K. Marriott, “ImAxes: Immersive axes
environments turn out to be superior on one or more metrics as embodied affordances for interactive multivariate
than alternative non-immersive methods may turn out to be data visualisation”, UIST 2017 - Proceedings of the
the key for a convincing business adoption case of this novel 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface
decision-making tool. Finally, picking on some still Software and Technology, 2017.
unresolved challenges on collaborative visualization [9], we https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126613.
will extend our work to multi-user, team decision-making.
[7] K. Marriott, F. Schreiber, T. Dwyer, K. Klein, N.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Riche and T. Itoh, et al., “Immersive
Analytics”, Germany: Springer International
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Publishing, 2018.
The University of Auckland Foundation and UoA Business
School. We also want to thank Aroaro Chief Architect David [8] T. Dwyer, K. Marriott, T. Isenberg, K. Klein, N.
White and Principal Programmer Aidan Quayle for their Riche, F. Schreiber, W. Stuerzlinger, and B. H.
thoughtful insights. Thomas, “Immersive Analytics: An Introduction”, in
Immersive Analytics, K. Marriott, F. Schreiber, T.
REFERENCES Dwyer, K. Klein, N. H. Riche, W. Stuerzlinger, T.
Itoh, and B. H. Thomas (Eds.). LNCS 11190,
[1] O.-H. Kwon, C. Muelder, K. Lee, and K.-L. Ma, “A Springer Nature, 2018.
study of layout, rendering, and interaction methods
for immersive graph visualization,” IEEE Trans. [9] P. Isenberg, N. Elmqvist, J. Scholtz, D. Cernea, K.
Visual. Comput. Graphics, pages 1–1, 2016. L. Ma, and H. Hagen, “Collaborative visualization:
Definition, challenges, and research agenda.”
Information Visualization, vol. 10, 4, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611412817.

– 110 –