Page 33 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 5 – Internet of Everything
P. 33

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 5





                                            Table 2 – IoE enabling technologies and features
          Technology Frequency         Range       Maximum       Channel   Band‑   Security  Reliability Latency
                       Band                        Date Rate     width
           LoRa        868 MHz,        15 km       50 kbps       125, 250, 500 kHz  Low       Low        High
                       915 MHz
           SigFox      915 to 928 MHz  20 km+      100 bps       100 Hz            Low        Low        High
           eMTC        700 − 900 MHz   < 15 km     1 Mbps        1.08  MHz         Medium/    Medium/    Low
                                                                 (1.4 MHz   carrier  High     High
                                                                 bandwidth)
           NB‑IoT      700 − 900 MHz   < 35 km     DL: 170 kbps  180 kHz           Medium/    Medium/    Low
                                                   UL: 250 kbps  (200 kHz carrier   High      High
                                                                 bandwidth)
           EC‑GSM‑     800 − 900 MHz   < 15 km     74 kbps       0.2 MHz           Medium/    Medium/    Low
           IoT                                     (GMSK), 240                     High       High
                                                   kbps (8 PSK)
           Bluetooth   2.4 GHz         50 m        2 Mbps        2 MHz             Low        Medium/    Low
                                                                                              High
           ZigBee      868 MHz,        Typically   250 kbps      2 MHz             Low        Low        High
                       915 MHz, and    less than
                       2.4 GHz         1 km
           Wi‑Fi       2.4 GHz, 5 GHz  100 m       54 Mbps       22 MHz            Medium/    Medium/    Low
                                                                                   High       High


          potential application domains for non‑cellular‑based LP‑  communication scenarios for V2X networks are 1) Vehicle
          WAN technologies.                                    to Vehicle (V2V) communications, in which information
          IoE will also play a major role in industrial automation in  is exchanged between vehicles; 2) Vehicle to Infrastruc‑
          the near future [53, 54]. Most industrial automation ap‑  ture (V2I) communications, which occur between vehi‑
          plications require high reliability and low latency. Small  clesandRoadsideUnits(RSUs), traf iclights, and basesta‑
          scale networks such as Wireless Highway Addressable  tions; 3) Vehicle to Pedestrian (V2P) communications, in
          Remote Transducer (WirelessHART), Wireless Interface  which vehicles communicate with people who are along
          for Sensors and Actuators (WISA), and Wireless Networks  the side of the road; and 4) Vehicle to Network (V2N),
          for Industrial Automation for Process Automation (WIA‑  where the vehicles connect to an entity in the networks
          PA), which are based on the IEEE 802.15.4 standard, and  e.g., a backend server or a traf ic information system [30].
          the WIAFA [4], which is based on the IEEE 802.11 stan‑  However, the requirements on latency and reliability are
          dards are typically used in industrial automation [30].  very high for V2X networks. Some basic requirements for
          However, they do not meet the high scalability and reli‑  V2X communication networks are low latency, high relia‑
          ability requirements required by many applications. In  bility, high throughput, interference‑robust, communica‑
          some industrial applications, the wireless transmission  tion range and mobility support. It is expected that 5G
          should potentially guarantee the PER around 10 −9  within  cellular networks will play an important role in this ap‑
          the transmission delay constraint as low as 10 µs [30]  plication domain.
          which may be dif icult for many LPWAN technologies. The  Currently, most of the LPWAN technologies use a star
          current state of the art of different technologies and re‑  topology and rely on wired infrastructure (e.g., cellular
          search studies suggest cellular‑based LPWAN technolo‑  LPWANs) or Internet (e.g., LoRaWAN) to integrate mul‑
          gies are the most suitable candidates for industrial au‑  tiple networks to cover large areas. The adoption of
          tomation applications. URLLC is one of the most impor‑  LPWAN technologies in rural and remote area applica‑
          tant features of the 5G mobile network. Thus, cellular‑  tions such as agricultural IoE and industrial IoE (e.g., for
          based technologies may be able to meet some of the in‑  oil/gas  ields) that may cover large areas is challenging.
          dustrial automation application criteria. The typical data  Some technologies for achieving last‑mile connectivity
          size of a packet in an industrial setting is only a few bytes  have been discussed in [56]. Cellular networks can be
          with different update frequency, latency and reliability  an ef icient last‑mile solution for rural areas due to sig‑
          requirements while the typical communication range is  ni icant cellular penetration in many rural areas across
          very low. Some valuable insights can be obtained from [4,  the world. Although WiFi is a mature technology, the
          34, 55]. ZigBee and Wi‑Fi could also be suitable for some  IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol gives poor end‑to‑end perfor‑
          industrial applications as well [4].                 mance for long‑range communication. Femtocell, which
          IoE networks are expected to play a crucial role in im‑  uses a small low‑power cellular base station, can be used
          proving transportation capability and ef iciency. Some  to provide cost‑effective cellular connectivity within its





                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2021                     21
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38