Page 102 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2020
P. 102

2020 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference




           5.3.2  Evolution of TN Architecture                    Specification Group Services and System Aspects,
                                                                  Release 15 Description,” Sep. 2019.
           TNs are likely to be multi-administrative, multi-layer and
           widely dispersed. A TN has multiple domains, e.g., the  [8] GSM Association, “5G implementation guidelines:
           domain of different infrastructure providers, the domain  NSA Option 3,” Feb. 2020.
           of optical and packet layers, and the domain of different
           geographical regions.  To evolve legacy TNs to T-SDN  [9] NGMN Alliance, “5G devices categorization,” Mar.
           enabled TNs, the requirements of different domains should  2020.
           be met, which can be achieved by adopting a hierarchical  [10] GSMA, “5G Spectrum,” Mar. 2020, GSMA Public
           architecture for the TN [26, 27], where some domain    Policy Position.
           SDN-controllers (also called child controllers) manage
           devices in their own domains, and a parent SDN-controller  [11] GSM Association, “5G implementation guidelines: SA
           manages E2E TN. It is advisable to adopt a domain-based  Option 2,” Feb. 2020.
           TN evolution, which simplifies deployment. In this way, the  [12] 3GPP, TS 38.101, “NR; user equipment (UE) radio
           first step is to develop a national domain for multiple CN  transmission and reception. Part 1: Range 1 standalone
           functions and/or multiple data centers. Next, lower layer  (Release 16),” Mar. 2020.
           domains (i.e., regional and local domains) can be gradually
           evolved to be SDN-enabled. For intra-domain evolution, a  [13] Huawei, “5G Spectrum,” Feb. 2020, Public Policy
           suitable deployment approach (greenfield, mixed, or hybrid)  Position.
           can be adopted, taking into account existing TN facilities.  [14] 3GPP, TS 38.300, “5G NR overall description: Stage-2,
                                                                  Release 16,” Mar. 2020.
              6. CONCLUSION AND LESSONS LEARNED
                                                              [15] S. Perrin, “5G Transport Networks: Heavy Reading
           We presented a practical and comprehensive approach for the  Operator Survey & Analysis,” Heavy Reading, Nov.
           deployment of future networks (5G and beyond) by explaining  2018.
           the end-to-end 5G architecture.  Our emphasis was on  [16] NGMN, “NGMN Overview on 5G RAN Functional
           cost-effective scenarios to expand existing facilities that can  Decomposition,” NGMN Alliance, Final Deliverable,
           also be used in 5G networks via simple software upgrades. In  2 2018, version 1.0.
           doing so, we presented different deployment choices for RAN,
           TN, and CN that take into account implementation time,  [17] ITU-T, GSTR-TN5G, “Transport network support of
           costs, existing infrastructure and other technical issues. As an  IMT-2020/5G,” 2018.
           important lesson, ensuring 5G compatibility in expanding the  [18] H. Son, “Comparison of commercial 5G network
           existing facilities via simple software upgrades is emphasized.  architecture: KT vs. SK Telecom,” Netmanias, Mar.
           Acknowledgment: This work was supported in part by     2019.
           Mobile Communications Company of Iran (MCI).
                                                              [19] Ericsson, “Ericsson microwave outlook,” Dec. 2018.
                                                              [20] ETSI GS mWT 002, “millimetre Wave Transmission
                            REFERENCES
                                                                  (mWT): Applications and use cases of millimetre wave
            [1] M. Series,  “IMT vision–framework and overall     transmission,” Aug. 2015.
               objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020  [21] ETSI GR mWT 015, “Frequency Bands and Carrier
               and beyond,” ITU Recommendation, pp. 2083–0, 2015.  Aggregation Systems: Band and carrier aggregation,”

            [2] ETSI, GR MEC 017, “Mobile Edge Computing (MEC):   Nov. 2017.
               Deployment of mobile edge computing in an NFV  [22] GSMA, “Mobile backhaul options: Spectrum analysis
               environment,” ETSI Group Reports, 2018.            and recommendations,” Sep. 2018.

            [3] ETSI, “Next generation protocols (NGP): An example of  [23] 3GPP TR 38.801, “Technical Specification Group Radio
               a non-IP network protocol architecture based on RINA  Access Network. Study on new radio access technology:
               design principles,” ETSI Group Reports, Feb. 2019.  Radio access architecture and interfaces,” Mar. 2017.
            [4] 3GPP, TS 23.501, “System architecture for the 5G  [24] G. Brown, “Cloud RAN & the Next-Generation Mobile
               system (5GS): Concepts and requirements, Release 16,”  Network Architecture,” Heavy Reading, Apr. 2017.
               Mar. 2020.
                                                              [25] ONF, “Migration Use Cases and Methods,” Feb. 2014.
            [5] R. Li, “Network 2030: Market drivers and prospects,”
               in Proc. 1st ITU Workshop on Network 2030, 2018.  [26] ONF, TR-522, “SDN Architecture for Transport
                                                                  Networks,” Mar. 2016.
            [6] GSM Association, “Road to 5G: Introduction and
               Migration,” Apr. 2018.                         [27] ITU-T, G.7702, “Architecture for SDN Control of
                                                                  Transport Networks,” Mar. 2018.
            [7] 3GPP,  “3GPP  TR   21.915  V15.0.0  Technical




                                                           – 44 –
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107