|
1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
IETF RFC 4510 (2006)
|
|
Title:
|
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
|
Standards-track was approved by IESG (Internet Engineering Steering Group)
|
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
|
This reference regards to revised H.350 and H.350.1-6 which were previously approved in 2003-2004 and referred to RFC 3377 for LDAP version 3 technical specifications. Since RFC 3377 was obsoleted entirely by RFC 4510, the revision of H.350 and H.350.1-6 requires reference to RFC 4510. It is noted that the LDAP technical specifications are now reorganized into this RFC 4510 and the following RFCs:
LDAP: The Protocol [RFC4511]
LDAP: Directory Information Models [RFC4512]
LDAP: Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms [RFC4513]
LDAP: String Representation of Distinguished Names [RFC4514]
LDAP: String Representation of Search Filters [RFC4515]
LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator [RFC4516]
LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules [RFC4517]
LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation [RFC4518]
LDAP: Schema for User Applications [RFC4519]
|
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
|
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=4510
|
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
|
The status of the referred RFC is "Proposed Standard".
|
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
|
The status of the referred RFC, is "Proposed Standard". Obsoletes RFC 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2255, 2256, 2829, 2830, 3377, 3771.
|
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
|
References within the referenced RFC are listed under item (8).
|
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
|
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
[RFC4511] Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006./
[RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June 2006./
[RFC4513] Harrison, R., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms", RFC 4513, June 2006./
[RFC4514] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished Names", RFC 4514, June 2006./
[RFC4515] Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Search Filters", RFC 4515, June 2006./
[RFC4516] Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator", RFC 4516, June 2006./
[RFC4517] Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules", RFC 4517, June 2006./
[RFC4518] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Internationalized String Preparation", RFC 4518, June 2006./
[RFC4519] Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC 4519, June 2006./
[RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006./
[RFC4521] Zeilenga, K., "Considerations for LDAP Extensions", BCP 118, RFC 4521, June 2006./
[X.500] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory -- Overview of concepts, models and services", X.500(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994)./
[X.501] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory -- Models", X.501(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-2:1994)./
[X.511] International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory: Abstract Service Definition", X.511(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-3:1993).
|
|
9.
|
Qualification of
ISOC/IETF:
|
|
|
9.1-9.6 Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7 The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8 Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
|
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
|
None
|
|
