Page 80 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024
P. 80

2024 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference


















             Fig. 4 Performance of fiber–wireless bridge system: (a) EVM vs. photocurrent at RAU-1; (b) constellations and
                                            spectrum of 20-GHz bandwidth signal.

           transmitted  to  free  space  using  a  35-dBi  antenna.  After
           transmission  over  approximately  4  m,  the  signal  was
           received using a 42-dBi antenna at RAU-2. The signal was
           amplified and converted to the optical domain using a high-
           speed  optical  modulator.  A  photonic  downconversion
           method  was  employed  to  simplify  the  antenna  site  and
           receiver. Using this method, another two-tone optical signal
           with a frequency separation of 84 GHz was generated at the
           Rx.  The  two  sidebands  were  separated,  and  the  lower
           sidebands were transmitted to RAU-2 for signal modulation.
           The modulated DSB-SC signal was transmitted to the Rx,
           and  the  upper  modulated  sideband  was  selected  and
           combined  with  the  unmodulated  sideband.  The  combined
           signal with a frequency separation of 16 GHz (= 100 – 84
           GHz)  was  input  to  a  low-speed  PD  for  conversion  to  an
                                                                 Fig. 5 Schematic of radio signal relay and routing.
           electrical signal. Finally, the signal was sent to a real-time
                                                                 RN: relay node; T/O: terahertz-to-optical; AP: access
           oscilloscope and demodulated offline. A photograph of the
                                                                             point: THz: terahertz.
           RAU-2 setup and the optical spectra at different points along
           the system are shown in the figure.                in the 0.22–0.8 mA range, attaining a line rate of 80 Gb/s.
                                                              For the 32-QAM signal, EVMs were slightly higher than the
                  Table 1 – Fiber–wireless bridge system
                                                              requirement. This could be caused by the low SNRs in some
                                                              subcarriers owing to the non-flat frequency response of the
               Parameter     Values   Parameter    Value
                                                              devices,  which  can  be  overcome  by  fully  optimizing  the
            Frequency       100 GHz   Distance   4 m          system.  In  addition,  basic  digital  signal  processing  (DSP)
            Tx. antenna     35 dBi    Rx antenna   42 dBi     using  classical  methods  was  applied  for  OFDM  signal
                                                              generation and demodulation. Performance and capacity can
            16 QAM signal   80 Gb/s   EVM        18.2%
                                                              be  improved  using  a  signal  calibration  algorithm  or  by
            32 QAM signal   100 Gb/s   EVM       17.9%
                                                              applying an adaptive bit and power loading to the signal. By
                                                              operating  the  system  under  optimized  conditions  and
           The key parameters and performance of the system are listed   applying  a  robust  DSP  at  the  receiver,  a  transmission
           in Table 1. An OFDM signal with a bandwidth of 25 GHz at   capacity of 100 Gb/s or higher can be expected for FWA and
           16 GHz consisting of 2,048 subcarriers, of which 20% were   emergency communications.
           inactive at the band edges, was generated and transmitted,
           and its performance in terms of the error vector magnitude   4.  MOBILE COVERAGE EXTENSION SYSTEM
           (EVM) was evaluated. The performance of the 16-QAM and
           32-QAM  signals  for  different  photocurrents  of  the  PD,  A schematic of the radio signal transparent relay and routing
           corresponding to different transmission powers of the THz  from  outdoor  to  indoor  environments  is  shown  in  Fig.  5.
           signal at RAU-1, are shown in Fig. 4 (a). Fig. 4(b) shows  Radio  signals  can  be  received  at  relay  nodes  (RNs)  and
           examples of the constellations and spectra of the received  directly converted to the optical domain for transmission to
           signals. The EVM values required for the 16-QAM and 32-  different  access  points  (APs)  located  indoors  to
           QAM signals to satisfy a 20% forward error correction (FEC)  communicate with end users. RNs can be installed on the
           overhead  are  22.09  and  15.96%,  respectively  [12].  The  rooftops or windows of buildings to receive radio signals.
           optimal  performance  was  achieved  at  a  photocurrent  of  RNs  comprise  a  high-speed  optical  modulator  for  direct
           approximately 0.4 mA. Further increasing or decreasing the  THz-to-optical (T/O) conversion and radio front ends. At the
           photocurrent  beyond  the  optimal  value  degrades  the  APs,  the  modulated  optical  signals  are  converted  back  to
           performance  because  of  signal-to-noise  ratio  (SNR)  THz signals using optical-to-THz (O/T) converters. The APs
           reduction and nonlinear distortion. For the 16-QAM signal,  can be flexibly placed at different locations to optimize the
           satisfactory performance was obtained for the photocurrent  communication  capacity  and  coverage.  RNs  and  APs  are




                                                           – 36 –
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85