Page 418 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024
P. 418

2024 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference

             1) User Latency v/s UAV – Altitude: Fig. 2 shows the  3) Optimization function v/s UAV-Altitude (for different
           trend of user latency with respect to the UAV altitude, where  PL max values): The optimization function here is considered
           the UAV altitude is varied between the 0 to 3200 meters  with λ value of 0.5, i.e. taking λ = 0.5 in eq.(21). Thus, the
           (The maximum possible altitude for a UAV with cell user  minimum altitude for optimization function is optimizing the
           path−loss < 110 dB). The user latency accounts for both  power and latency functions in equal proportions, as shown in
           the transmission delay and the propagation delay, if a UDP  Fig. 4. The curve also shows the variations of the optimization
           data packet is to be transmitted from UAV to a ground based  function curve for different PL max values. As the PL max
           UE. It can be observed that the user latency follows a bell  is increased, the maximum attainable altitude of the UAV
           shaped curve. The propagation delay for low range UAV  also increases. The optimization point also shifts slightly to
           (< 1.5km) is negligible compared to the transmission delay.  a higher UAV elevation as the PL max is increased.
           Thus, the latency is dominated by transmission delay or more
           appropriately the bitrate.

















                                                                 Fig. 5. Optimization Function vs UAV Altitude (for different densities)

                                                                 4) Optimization function v/s UAV-Altitude (for different user
                                                               densities): λ = 0.5 is considered here, to observe the variation
                     Fig. 3. Power Consumption vs UAV Altitude
                                                               in the optimization function with varying UAV altitudes, and
             2) Power Consumption v/s UAV-Altitude: From the power  depicted in Fig. 5, which is plotted for different user densities.
           model, it can be seen that power consumed is proportional to  Three cases are considered (i.e. low, medium and high user
           the UAV swarm size. The UAV swarm size is the minimum  density). As the user density increases, the optimization curve
           number of UAVs required to provide coverage to a given area  shifts in the y direction and the optimum elevation also shifts
           A T . The coverage area of a UAV changes with its altitude and  to a lower value.
           is maximum at the optimum altitude where the coverage radius
           is maximum [5]. Thus power consumption plot, as shown in
           Fig. 3, forms a U shaped curve with the minimum at the
           optimum UAV altitude. However, since the swarm size is a
           discrete number, a step variation in the power latency plot can
           be observed.











                                                                 Fig. 6. Optimization Function vs UAV Altitude (for different λ values)

                                                                 5) Optimization function v/s UAV-Altitude (for different λ
                                                               values): λ is balancing the trade-off between the latency and
                                                               the power functions in the final optimization function. For
                                                               higher value of λ, the optimum altitude is a higher value,
                                                               as the optimum points shifts towards right (towards optimum
           Fig. 4. Optimization Function vs UAV Altitude (for different PL max values)  point of the power function), as depicted in Fig. 6. Similarly
                                                               for lower values of λ, the optimum UAV elevation reduces.



                                                            – 374 –
   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423