|
1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
|
All of the documents are approved OMA specifications
|
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
|
This OMA standard is referenced in ITU-T Y.oneM2M.DM.OMA
|
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
|
There are IPR claims concerning presence in the OMA IPR data base
|
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
|
The documents are all approved OMA specifications that are undergoing continuing development
|
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
|
[DMPRO] “OMA Device Management Protocol, Version 1.2”. Open Mobile Alliance?./
OMA-TS-DM-Protocol-V1_2, URL:http://www.openmobilealliance.org/
[DMTND] “OMA Device Management Tree and Description, Version 1.2”. Open Mobile Alliance?./
OMA-TS-DM-TND-V1_2. URL:http://www.openmobilealliance.org/
[IOPPROC] “OMA Interoperability Policy and Process”, Version 1.13, Open Mobile Alliance™, OMAIOP-Process-V1_13,/
URL:http://www.openmobilealliance.org//
[OMADM] OMA Device Management, Version 1.2. Open Mobile Alliance?./
URL:http://www.openmobilealliance.org/
[RFC2119] “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels”, S. Bradner, March 1997,/
URL:http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt/
[RFC2234] “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF”. D. Crocker, Ed., P. Overell. November/
1997, URL:http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2234.txt
|
|
9.
|
Qualification of
OMA:
|
|
|
Qualification of OMA: OMA is recognized under the provisions of ITU-T Recommendation A.5. Qualifying information is on file in TSB.
|
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
|
None
|
