Committed to connecting the world

  •  
wtisd

ITU-T work programme

Home : ITU-T Home : ITU-T Work Programme : G.1028     
  ITU-T A.5 justification information for referenced document IETF RFC 6076 (2011) in draft G.1028
1. Clear description of the referenced document:
Name: IETF RFC 6076 (2011)
Title: Basic Telephony SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics
2. Status of approval:
Approved Standard
3. Justification for the specific reference:
This reference contains definitions for IP network metrics linked to the ones used in this Recommendation.
4. Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/.
5. Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
Approved in 2011-01.
6. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
Approved in 2011-01.
7. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
N/A
8. Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
/
[RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002./
/
[RFC3262] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "Reliability of Provisional Responses in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3262, June 2002./
/
[RFC3265] Roach, A., "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event Notification", RFC 3265, June 2002./
/
[RFC3665] Johnston, A., Donovan, S., Sparks, R., Cunningham, C., and K. Summers, "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Basic Call Flow Examples", BCP 75, RFC 3665, December 2003./
/
[RFC4780] Lingle, K., Mule, J-F., Maeng, J., and D. Walker, "Management Information Base for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 4780, April 2007.
9. Qualification of ISOC/IETF:
9.1-9.6     Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7     The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8     Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
10. Other (for any supplementary information):
None
Note: This form is based on Recommendation ITU-T A.5