Committed to connecting the world

  •  
Submarine cables

ITU-T work programme

Home : ITU-T Home : ITU-T Work Programme : Q.1741.6     
  ITU-T A.5 justification information for referenced document IETF RFC 5213 (2008) in draft Q.1741.6
1. Clear description of the referenced document:
Name: IETF RFC 5213 (2008)
Title: Proxy Mobile IPv6, August 2008
2. Status of approval:
Normative
3. Justification for the specific reference:
To reference the specifications (RFCs) as produced by IETF to describe certain aspects of the IMT2000 family member “Release 8 of GSM evolved UMTS Core Network”.
4. Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=5213
5. Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
This RFC has been in existence since August 2008.
6. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
RFC 5213 is a standards-track document and is currently in the "Proposed Standard" state. Current standards status of this document can be found at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1rfc_index.txt.
7. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
8. Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
[2] Conta, A. and S. Deering, "Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification", RFC 2473, December 1998./
[3] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP", RFC 3168, September 2001./
[4] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003./
[5] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004./
[6] Aboba, B., Beadles, M., Arkko, J., and P. Eronen, "The Network Access Identifier", RFC 4282, December 2005./
[7] Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K. Chowdhury, "Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)", RFC 4283, November 2005./
[8] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006./
[9] Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005./
[10] Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", FC 4303, December 2005./
[11] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, September 2007./
9. Qualification of ISOC/IETF:
9.1-9.6     Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7     The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8     Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
10. Other (for any supplementary information):
None
Note: This form is based on Recommendation ITU-T A.5