Inclusion Without Safety Is Not Empowerment: Automation Is Scaling Harm Faster Than We Can Respond
Away from Keyboard Inc, Soroptimist International, Women 4 STEM
Session 243
Efforts to expand access to technology are accelerating. More women and girls are being encouraged to participate, build skills, and enter emerging fields. But safety is not keeping pace.
This session challenges a common assumption: that inclusion alone leads to empowerment. For many women, girls, and gender-diverse people, increased access without safety, representation, and influence is creating new forms of harm.
Automation is driving this shift. Systems built to optimise engagement and efficiency also shape exposure, behaviour, and risk. They interact with existing inequalities and amplify them at scale. A teenager drawn into escalating content through recommendation systems. A woman facing harassment as she builds visibility online. A person with disability denied essential funding by a standardised assessment, the risk then displaced onto an unpaid carer, almost always a woman. The pattern is consistent. Harm is not random. It is shaped, repeated, and intensified by systems that learn faster than safeguards can adapt.
Relevant work
This session draws on a sustained body of delivery, not a single project. Across UN CSW70, the SHIELD global online safety conference, the IPPPRI international child protection conference, and recent workshops in Australia, we have worked through the specific harms this session names: technology-facilitated gender-based violence, child online exploitation and escalating content, digital overload and its mental health toll, and the way disconnection and isolation make women more vulnerable online.
Our current research extends this into automated care systems, where AI-shaped decisions can act as digital gatekeepers, automating coercive control by denying funding for housing or transport autonomy, and where culturally and linguistically diverse women are systematically unseen by models that lack their context. In April 2026 we facilitated a multinational consultation toward a declaration on technology-facilitated gender-based violence, with participants from thirteen countries, and we contribute to the IEEE Industry Connections activity on AI and family violence.
Vision
WSIS built two decades of progress on access and infrastructure. The unfinished work is safety and accountability. Our vision for WSIS beyond the twenty-year review is straightforward: inclusion efforts must not increase harm.
That means embedding safety into system design, making accountability measurable and enforceable, and recognising compounding risk, where vulnerabilities do not simply add up but multiply. It means shifting from reacting after harm to preventing it, and asking where responsibility sits when harm is predictable.
This session introduces compounding risk as a practical lens and moves the conversation from access to safe, meaningful participation. Inclusion is the starting point. Safety is what makes it real.
-
C1. The role of governments and all stakeholders in the promotion of ICTs for development
-
C3. Access to information and knowledge
-
C4. Capacity building
-
C5. Building confidence and security in use of ICTs
-
C7. ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life — E-government
-
C7. ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life — E-business
-
C7. ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life — E-learning
-
C7. ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life — E-health
-
C9. Media
-
C10. Ethical dimensions of the Information Society
-
C11. International and regional cooperation
This session sits most directly under C5 (building confidence and security) and C10 (ethical dimensions of the information society). Our central argument is that automation is not neutral, and that ethical frameworks must address how systems shape behaviour, exposure, and opportunity, including the way inclusion efforts can unintentionally increase harm.
It connects to C3 and C4 because safe participation depends on access to information and the capability to use it well. It links to C7 across e-government, e-health, e-employment, e-business, and e-learning, where automated decision-making can exclude or misclassify people whose needs are not reflected in standardised data, particularly women, gender-diverse people, and people with disability. C8 and C9 speak to representation and the amplification of harmful narratives. C1, C6, and C11 frame the shared responsibility of governments, industry, and civil society to set enforceable expectations and align standards across borders while respecting local realities.
-
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all
-
Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
-
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
-
Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
-
Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries
-
Goal 16: Promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies
-
Goal 17: Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Goal 5 is central. The harms we examine fall heavily on women, girls, and gender-diverse people, from online harassment to misgendered or incomplete datasets that drive exclusion. Goal 16 frames the need for accountable institutions and safe, inclusive participation. Goal 9 connects to responsible innovation: infrastructure and emerging technology must be built with safety as a design requirement. Goal 10 recognises that automated systems can widen inequality when they learn from biased data and optimise for engagement over wellbeing.
The session also supports Goal 3 (health and wellbeing, including the mental health effects of online environments), Goal 4 (safe and inclusive learning), and Goal 17, since the work depends on partnership across civil society, industry, and government. Safe participation is a precondition for sustainable development, not a later add-on.
- Objective 1: Close all digital divides and accelerate progress across the Sustainable Development Goals
- Objective 2: Expand inclusion in and benefits from the digital economy for all
- Objective 3: Foster an inclusive, open, safe and secure digital space that respects, protects and promotes human rights
- Objective 5: Enhance international governance of artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity
Away from Keyboard: https://afk.org.au
https://www.linkedin.com/company/away-from-keyboard-afk-inc/
Soroptimist International: https://www.soroptimistinternational.org/
Women 4 STEM: https://women4stem.com.au/about/
LinkedIn (Sarah Barnbrook): https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-barnbrook-263323151/
Free Governance Tools: https://alttab.afk.org.au/