Page 239 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024
P. 239

COPYRIGHT IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: UNRAVELLING THE
                     COMPLEXITIES FOR THE PROTECTION OF AI-GENERATED WORK




                                               Hoshiar, Singh ; Kiran, Sharma
                                                           1
                                                                         2
                                   1 Department of Telecommunication, Government of India, India
                                          2 ICFAI Law School, IFHE, Hyderabad, India



                              ABSTRACT                        becomes:  who  or  what  owns  the  copyright  for  these  AI-
                                                              generated creations? Is it the programmer who built the AI,
           The  rise  of  artificial  intelligence  (AI)  as  a  creative  tool   or the AI itself?  The “labour theory” of copyright suggests
           disrupts the traditional realm of copyright law. This work   protection should be awarded based on the creator’s effort.
           explores  the  complexities  of  copyright  protection  for  AI-  Is AI simply a tool, or can it be considered a creative force?
           generated works. We examine the concept of authorship, a
           cornerstone  of  copyright,  and  its  applicability  to  AI.   Further complexities arise when we consider the data used
           Ownership of AI creations will be analyzed, considering the   to train AI models.  If copyrighted material is used, does it
           programmer’s  role  and  the  training  data’s  influence.   constitute  fair  use  or  copyright  infringement?    This
           Furthermore,  using  copyrighted  material  in  AI  training   becomes even more nuanced when the AI itself generates
           raises  questions  about  fair  use  and  infringement.  By   content that bears a resemblance to copyrighted works.
           unraveling  these  issues,  this  work  seeks  to  illuminate  the
           path toward a copyright framework that fosters innovation   Granting  copyright  protection  to  AI  raises  additional
           while safeguarding the rights of creators and AI developers   concerns.  Who will be held liable for infringement of AI-
           in the age of AI.                                  generated  works  –  the  programmer,  the  user,  or  the  AI
                                                              itself?
            Keywords - Artificial Intelligence, copyright, authorship,
                           copyright protection               This  paper  sets  the  stage  for  exploring  these  intricate
                                                              questions.  By  unraveling  the  complexities  at  the
              1.  INTRODUCTION                                intersection  of  copyright  and AI,  we  can  work  towards  a
                                                              framework  that  fosters  innovation  while  ensuring  proper
                                                              protection for both human creators and AI developers.
           Copyright law, traditionally designed to protect the fruits of
           human  creativity,  faces  a  new  challenge  in  the  age  of
           artificial  intelligence  (AI).  AI  is  no  longer  relegated  to   2.  THE CONCEPT OF COPYRIGHT
           mundane tasks; it’s capable of generating creative outputs
           like  music,  art,  and  even  literature.  This  begs  a  critical   Copyright  acts  as  a  shield  for  creative  works,  giving  the
           question:  how  do  copyright  principles  adapt  to  this   creator  control  over  how  their  work  is  used.  This  legal
           innovative landscape?                              concept,  rooted  in  intellectual  property  law,  grants  the
                                                              owner exclusive rights.  In simpler terms, the owner gets to
           Let’s begin by revisiting the core tenets of copyright. At its   decide how their creation – a song, a painting, a book – can
           heart,  copyright  protects  original  works  fixed  in  any   be shared or used by others.  Copyright safeguards the way
           tangible medium. So, as long as the work is ‘original’ amd   ideas and information are expressed in a tangible form, like
           ‘fixed’ nearly  any  type of  work  can  qualify  for  copyright   being written down, recorded as music, or captured as an
           protection. Originality refers to a work’s unique expression,   image.  However, it’s important to remember that copyright
           not  necessarily  the  underlying  idea.  According  to  United   doesn’t  protect  the  raw  ideas  themselves,  but  rather  the
           States  Supreme  Court,  originality  means  author’s   unique  way  they  are  brought  to  life.  Copyright  protects
           “independently  created  work”  with  “minimal  degree  of   original works, but what exactly makes a work “original”?
           creativity”. Copyright protects specific subject matter, like   The  work  must  be  your  creation,  not  a  copy  of  someone
           literary  works,  music,  or  visual  arts.  Authorship,   else’s.  There  needs  to  be  a  minimal  level  of  creativity,  a
           traditionally reserved for humans, becomes a central issue   “spark” as the Supreme Court puts it. This doesn’t require a
           when AI enters the picture.                        groundbreaking  masterpiece,  but  there  should  be  some
                                                              originality in how you express yourself.
           Computer-generated works have existed for some time, but
           AI raises the bar in terms of creativity.  The question then





            978-92-61-39091-4/CFP2268P @ITU 2024          – 195 –                                   Kaleidoscope
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244