Page 244 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024

2024 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference

property. As AI technology continues to advance, it is REFERENCES
crucial for society to navigate the legal and ethical
dimensions of AI-generated works to ensure fair and [1] “Generative AI could leave users holding the bag
appropriate protection for creators and their creations. for copyright violations 2024”
https://theconversation.com/generative-ai-could-
AI is trained on a dataset that could be already protected leave-users-holding-the-bag-for-copyright-
under copyright. But if the result or we can say the violations-225760
expression is original then it becomes the subject matter of
copyright. The protection over the databases or the work [2] “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright
created by arrangement is also based on the already existing Law 2023”.
copyrighted work. There is a need to develop specific https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/L
guidelines and tests to assess whether the use of SB10922
copyrighted material in training AI systems constitutes fair
use or copyright infringement. Several countries are [3] “India: Idea-Expression Dichotomy Under
enacting laws to tackle potential copyright infringement Copyright Law”, 2016.
during AI training. These laws often incorporate fair use https://www.mondaq.com/india/copyright/536650/
exceptions or special allowances for Text and Data Mining idea-expression-dichotomy-under-copyright-law
(TDM). The European Union’s Digital Single Market
(DSM) Directive has sparked significant debate and [4] “The Legal Implications of AI-Generated Content
research regarding these TDM exceptions and limitations. in Copyright Law” 2023.
There is also a need to encourage collaboration between AI https://indiaai.gov.in/article/the-legal-implications-
developers and copyright holders to establish licensing of-ai-generated-content-in-copyright-law
frameworks and permissions for the use of protected works
in AI training. [5] “What is artificial intelligence (AI)?”, 2024.
https://www.ibm.com/topics/artificial-intelligence
At international level, the United Nations established the
UNICRI Center for AI and Robotics in the Hague to [6] “Will copyright law enable or inhibit generative
spearhead research in the field. UNESCO, in November AI?”, 2024.
2021, adopted a non-binding global agreement on the https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/crackin
ethical development of AI, providing member states with g-the-code-generative-ai-and-intellectual-property/
shared values and principles. The Organization for
Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) [7] A. Gil, N. Juliana & S. David, “Generative AI Has
released recommendations for AI development in May 2019 an Intellectual Property Problem, 2023.
(OECD Recommendation of the Council on Artificial https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-
Intelligence). At regional level European Union (EU) has intellectual-property-problem
played a major role. The EU’s Robolaw Project identified
five key areas for AI regulation. Following the project, the [8] A. Piskopani, “Responsible ai and the arts: the
EU parliament adopted three regulations in October 2020 ethical and legal implications of ai in the arts and
covering civil liability, intellectual property, and ethics in creative industries”,, 2023.
AI. The Commission’s 2021 proposal emphasized https://doi.org/10.1145/3597512.3597528
transparent, safe, and secure AI development, upholding
human rights. Similarly, more international harmonization [9] A. Zhuk, “Navigating the legal landscape of ai
is required to establish a more unified international copyright: a comparative analysis of eu, us, and
approach which is essential for fostering global chinese approaches”, AI and Ethics, 2023.
collaboration in AI-driven creativity. Encouraging global https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00299-0
policymakers and stakeholders to collaborate on developing
harmonized international standards and guidelines for the [10] C. Asay, “Independent creation in a world of ai”,
protection of AI-generated works is needed. Fiu Law Review, vol. 14, no. 2, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.14.2.5
Ultimately, navigating copyright in the age of AI requires a
collaborative effort. Legal scholars, policymakers, [11] C. Aulia, “copyright responsibilities of artificial
technologists, and creative communities must work together intelligence in the digital age”, Indonesia Law
to develop a framework that fosters innovation while Reform Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 145-154, 2023.
safeguarding the rights of creators, both human and https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.26042
machine. By embracing these complexities, we can ensure
that AI’s creative potential flourishes within a fair and [12] C. Wei, “copyright protection and data reliability
balanced copyright ecosystem. of ai-written literary creations in smart city”,
Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2022,
p. 1-13, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6498468

– 200 –