1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
Standards track RFC - Proposed Standard approved May 2021.
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
Using TLS is one of the key features of QUIC, and is also the core problem to be addressed in utilizing multicast based on QUIC. In H.705.2 (ex H.IPTV-OUICReg), the mechanism of distributing QUIC packets via multicast is proposed in regard to TLS features in QUIC.
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?draft=&rfc=9000&doctitle=&group=&holder=&iprtitle=&patent=&submit=rfc
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
RFC 9001 was published in May 2021 and is a standards track RFC. Using TLS is one of the key features of QUIC, and QUIC is widely used for data transport and multimedia delivery services.
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
The concepts in this document is sufficiently stable for our use.
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
None
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
Normative References/
[AEAD] McGrew, D., "An Interface and Algorithms for Authenticated Encryption", RFC 5116, DOI 10.17487/RFC5116, January 2008, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5116./
[AES] "Advanced encryption standard (AES)", National Institute of Standards and Technology report, DOI 10.6028/nist.fips.197, November 2001, https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.fips.197./
[ALPN] Friedl, S., Popov, A., Langley, A., and E. Stephan, "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension", RFC 7301, DOI 10.17487/RFC7301, July 2014, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7301./
[CHACHA] Nir, Y. and A. Langley, "ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols", RFC 8439, DOI 10.17487/RFC8439, June 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8439./
[HKDF] Krawczyk, H. and P. Eronen, "HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF)", RFC 5869, DOI 10.17487/RFC5869, May 2010, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5869./
[QUIC-RECOVERY] Iyengar, J., Ed. and I. Swett, Ed., "QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control", RFC 9002, DOI 10.17487/RFC9002, May 2021, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9002./
[QUIC-TRANSPORT] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9000./
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119./
[RFC4086] Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086, DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4086./
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174./
[SHA] Dang, Q., "Secure Hash Standard", National Institute of Standards and Technology report, DOI 10.6028/nist.fips.180-4, July 2015, https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.fips.180-4./
[TLS-REGISTRIES] Salowey, J. and S. Turner, "IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS", RFC 8447, DOI 10.17487/RFC8447, August 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8447./
[TLS13] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446./
/
Informative References/
[AEBounds] Luykx, A. and K. Paterson, "Limits on Authenticated Encryption Use in TLS", 28 August 2017, https://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/TLS-AEbounds.pdf./
[ASCII] Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", STD 80, RFC 20, DOI 10.17487/RFC0020, October 1969, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc20./
[CCM-ANALYSIS] Jonsson, J., "On the Security of CTR + CBC-MAC", Selected Areas in Cryptography, SAC 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2595, pp. 76-93, DOI 10.1007/3-540-36492-7_7, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36492-7_7./
[COMPRESS] Ghedini, A. and V. Vasiliev, "TLS Certificate Compression", RFC 8879, DOI 10.17487/RFC8879, December 2020, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8879./
[GCM-MU] Hoang, V., Tessaro, S., and A. Thiruvengadam, "The Multi- user Security of GCM, Revisited: Tight Bounds for Nonce Randomization", CCS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1429-1440, DOI 10.1145/3243734.3243816, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734.3243816./
[HTTP-REPLAY] Thomson, M., Nottingham, M., and W. Tarreau, "Using Early Data in HTTP", RFC 8470, DOI 10.17487/RFC8470, September 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8470./
[HTTP2-TLS13] Benjamin, D., "Using TLS 1.3 with HTTP/2", RFC 8740, DOI 10.17487/RFC8740, February 2020, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8740./
[IMC] Katz, J. and Y. Lindell, "Introduction to Modern Cryptography, Second Edition", ISBN 978-1466570269, 6 November 2014./
[NAN] Bellare, M., Ng, R., and B. Tackmann, "Nonces Are Noticed: AEAD Revisited", Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11692, pp. 235-265, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-26948-7_9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26948-7_9./
[QUIC-HTTP] Bishop, M., Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 3 (HTTP/3)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- quic-http-34, 2 February 2021, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-http-34./
[RFC2818] Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, DOI 10.17487/RFC2818, May 2000, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2818./
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280./
[ROBUST] Fischlin, M., Günther, F., and C. Janson, "Robust Channels: Handling Unreliable Networks in the Record Layers of QUIC and DTLS 1.3", 16 May 2020, https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/718.
|
9.
|
Qualification of
ISOC/IETF:
|
|
9.1-9.6 Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7 The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8 Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
None.
|
|