Page 64 - U4SSC Simple ways to be smart
P. 64

Table 4: Phases of crisis decision-making
               Phase                 Focus                                    Example

              1          Identify the inflection point    Two facts became obvious: (1) the city's entire water
                         between normal and crisis        supply is from the Loire and (2) the water in the Loire
                         situation                        may be contaminated
              2          What makes the risk become       A reaction is needed and cannot be delayed further
                         acute?                           without endangering people’s health
              3          Possible decisions are           If, for example, the city’s water supply is stopped then
                         considered and the effects that   alternatives will be needed to get water to people
                         will be triggered are identified
              4          Resources are assessed           The means to get water to people are assessed and
                                                          the available resources measured
              5          The decision is evaluated        With the collected information, it is now possible
                                                          to evaluate the impact of the decision and possibly
                                                          suggest different options
              6          Action is taken and the collective   The water supply is stopped and alternative water
                         system retracts against the crisis  supply measures are initiated; the scenario plays out




            A "simple and smart" structured review method might include the follow steps:

            1  All information about the crisis, the responses and the consequences is recorded and stored
                in the municipal archives.

            2  Identify a facilitator with good interpersonal skills and an auditor to record the sessions.
            3  Establish a list of the main actors in the crisis and other parties that are interested in the review.

            4  Invite teachers to the review so that they can take account of lessons learnt and develop new
                best practices.

            5  Identify the stages of the unfolding of the crisis and what happened at each stage in a factual
                manner.

            6  Identify the main points that impeded progress during the crisis and understand why.

            7  Make use of traditional consulting tools such as a SWOT analysis to better understand the
                effectiveness of city responses.
            8  Use a participatory tool to get the opinions of the local population of the city’s handling of the
                crisis, immediately and up to 2 years after the event.

            9  Identify changes in structures, processes or practices that will be able to ease the response to
                similar crises in the future and draft recommendations to the appropriate structures.
            10 Set up steps to monitor the implementation of recommendations, built into city annual plans.










             52  U4SSC: Simple ways to be smart
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69