Page 90 - ITUJournal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 1
P. 90

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 1




          two  possible  bands  for  5G  introduction  –  3.4-3.8   these essential resources is the spectrum, playing a
          GHz and 4.8-4.99 GHz. A study of propagation model   role as an integral element of the digital economy
          [18] and required base station density [19] in two   ecosystem.  In  terms  of  economic  value,  the
          bands  shows  that  cost  ratio  ak  for  the  second  spectrum  could  be  ranked  alongside  national
          frequency  band  will  be  almost  twice  as  much,  reserves  of  energy  and  raw  materials.  Multisided
          making low band utilisation more efficient under all  limits  of  spectrum  use  require  international  and
          other equal conditions (penetration rate, spectrum   national actions to avoid them to be transgressed.
          availability,   economies   of   scale,   border     The  digital  economy  urgently  requires  a  digital
          coordination, etc.).                                 spectrum  management  system  to  accommodate
                                                               new radio technologies and to facilitate economic
          5.   CONCLUSIONS
                                                               growth.
          Transition to a sustainable model of development     The input-output model can be considered as the
          through  the  digital  economy  is  the  guiding  force   proper mechanism for appropriate assessment and
          driving  the  current  stage  of  human  technological   optimization  of  the  use  of  resources  at  the
          progress.  This  is  of  immense  importance,  not  so   macroeconomic  level,  providing  a  complex
          much  for  generating  economic  profit,  as  for    evaluation  of  the  consequences  of  all  possible
          identifying ways of ensuring humanity’s continued    scenarios and to assist decision makers in selection
          survival.  Humanity  on  board  “Noah's  Ark”        of those which best serve their strategic goals. Our
          consumes  resources  in  an  uncontrolled  way       “Noah's Ark” needs not only the wind of A. Smith
          through  constantly  increasing  consumption  that   and  R.  Coase  market  forces  to  fill  its  sails,  but  a
          “bores  holes  in  the  hull”,  and  thus  unthinkingly   steering wheel of W. Leontief and L. Kantorovich is
          destroys its critical life-support systems. We should   required  also,  heating  and  bearing  to  true  at  all
          hope  that  artificial  intelligence  will  help  us  to   times  in  order  to  avoid  reefs  and  shoals  and  to
          understand that our current irrational devouring of   overcome storms.  As the current situation shows,
          resources  has  no  future,  and  that  even  our    the market economy in some cases cannot resolve
          immediate    descendants     would    encounter      problems of negative externality and protect public
          catastrophic problems bequeathed to them by their    interest.  Resource  management  policy  should
          grandparents.
                                                               consider social costs and internalization of negative
          Successful  worldwide  implementation  of  a  digital   externalities  to  ensure  optimal  social  welfare,
          economy  initiatives  must  be  based  on  the       including environmental quality and protection of
          optimization  of  all  available  resources  use  with   future generation interests.
          respect  of  available  resources  boundaries.  One  of


          REFERENCES

          [1]  R.H.  Coase,  “The  Federal  Communications     [6]   World Economic Forum. Statista, Feb. 2019.
               Commission”,    The   Journal   Law    and            Available: https://www.weforum.org/.
               Economics, Volume 2, Oct. 1959.
                                                               [7]   A.  Ratier,  “Socio-Economic  Benefit  of  Polar
          [2]  H.J. Levin, “The Invisible Resource: Use and          Satellite Data”,  presented at the  EUMETSAT
               Regulation of the Radio Spectrum”. The John           Meteorological Satellite Conference. Geneva,
               Hopkins University Press, 1971.                       23 Sept. 2014.
          [3]  CSP  International  Ltd.,  “Deregulation  of  the  [8]  US Congress, “Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
               Radio  Spectrum  in  the  UK”.  H.M. Stationery       Creation  Act  of  2012”,  Public  Law  112–96,
               Office, 1987.                                         Feb. 22, 2012.

          [4]  Report ITU-R SM.2012, “Economic aspects of      [9]   FCC News. “Additional spectrum to help keep
               spectrum  management”.  Geneva,  2018.                Americans  connected  during  coronavirus
               Available:  https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-            pandemic”. Washington D.C., March 15, 2020.
               SM.2012.
                                                               [10] J. Conrad, “Resource Economics”, Cambridge
          [5]  WT  Docket  No.  00-230,  “Comments  of  37           University Press, 2010.
               concerned  economists.  Promoting  efficient    [11] Report ITU-R SM.2352, “Technology trends of
               use of spectrum”, Feb. 2001.
                                                                     active services in the band above 275 GHz”,




          74                                 © International Telecommunication Union, 2021
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95