Page 57 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 7 – Terahertz communications
P. 57

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 7




          The  saturated  output  power  is  plotted  over  the   desired  collector  bias  shifts  towards  class-A.  The
          UmmW band in Fig. 6. The highest output power is     gain at 220 GHz is 7 dB higher for the CB compared
          demonstrated with GaN HEMTs up to 140 GHz and        to the CE stage.
          InP HBTs above 140 GHz. The rapid drop in power
          for GaN is due to the limited fmax of the technology.
          Optimizing GaN HEMTs for high-breakdown tends
          to  also  compromise  the  gate-drain  capacitance
          parasitics   that    impact     millimeter-wave
          performance.  Recent  work  on  N-polar  GaN  may
          offer  new  device  physics  for  millimeter-wave
          operation  [21].  Above  250  GHz,  the  InP  HBT  and
          GaAs  mHEMT  stand  out  as  the  only  technologies
          that  generate  reasonable  output  power.  SiGe  has
          provided  competitive  performance  in  bands
          between 100 and 200 GHz [9]. Silicon technologies
          have  to  date  only  offered  very  limited  power
          above 200  GHz.  Recent  work  on  Gmax-boosted
          approaches  has  pushed  the  output  power
          towards 10 dBm with limited efficiency [22].          Fig. 7 - Common-base versus common-emitter for a constant
                                                                collector-emitter voltage for a 0.25um InP HBT process.
          6.   AN INP UMMW POWER AMPLIFIER                     The  CB  HBT  provides  higher  MAG  over  the

          To demonstrate a high-efficiency PA design above     millimeter-wave band since the feedback parasitics
          100  GHz,  we  have  demonstrated  circuit  design   in the CB amplifier are due to the collector-emitter
          techniques  to  maximize  efficiency  based  on  the   capacitance, CCE, compared to the larger collector-
          250-nm InP HBT process with fmax of approximately    base capacitance, CCB. Feedback current in the CB
          600 GHz.  As  described  previously,  this  InP  HBT   HBT  is  therefore  much  smaller  than  in  the  CE
          process offers a PAE as high as 45% due to 1) the    topology  and  the  PA  is  unconditionally  stable
          high  fmax  and  2)  load-line  matching  conditions   without  additional  stabilization.  Base  inductance
          close to 50 Ohms for an output power of 15 dBm.      typically  impacts  the  stability  of  the  CB
                                                               configuration; however, the InP HBT process allows
          Theoretically, the fmax is invariant to the choice of   that the base can be directly connected to ground to
          CE or CB configuration. While Common-Emitter (CE)    eliminate  any  bypass  capacitance  requirement  to
          amplifiers are conventionally used in PA design, we   produce  an  AC  ground  at  the  base  node  and  the
          compare  the  MAG  of  CE  and  Common-Base  (CB)    potential base inductance to connect to the bypass
          amplifiers in the InP HBT process in Fig. 7 over a   capacitor.
          range of collector bias conditions at 140 GHz and    The InP HBT offers a physics-based scalable model
          220  GHz.  Generally,  we  observe  that  the  gain   that allows accurate load pull simulation of the CB
          remains  relatively  high  in  all  cases  but  sharply   device. A 4-finger by 4um (16 um total) CE or CB
          reduces below a certain current density threshold.   HBT emitter length produces a 100-Ohm load-line
          This  substantial  reduction  in  gain  occurs  when   impedance for maximum gain and efficiency. Based
          the K  stability  factor  becomes  imaginary.  Over  a   on this transistor periphery, the output power, PAE,
          range of collector biases between 0.1 mA/um and      and gain at peak PAE for the CE and CB amplifier are
          3 mA/um (Imax), the CB provides 5dB higher than      plotted  at  140  GHz  in  Fig.  8  as  a  function  of  the
          the  CE  transistor  at  both  frequency  bands.  At   quiescent collector current (normalized by length)
          140 GHz, the CB provides higher gain close to the    under the condition of fixed 2.5-V collector-emitter
          class-B biasing condition (Ic of zero) and the gain   voltage.  Note  that  the  DC  current  differs
          increases  slightly  as  we  shift  to  class  A.    significantly  from  the  quiescent  current  as  the
          The additional  gain  allows  optimization  for      PA shifts from class-B to class-A where the ratio of
          class-B operation in CB that would not be possible   IDC/IQ approaches unity.
          in CE.
                                                               The peak output power is 16 dBm at class A for CE
          Examining  the  220  GHz  operation,  the  CB  gain   and drops to around 14 dBm under the class B bias.
          drops 2 dB relative to 140 GHz. However, the gain    The CB  configuration  produces similar or  slightly
          of the CE transistor drops substantially (4 dB) as the   lower  output  power  than  the  CE  amplifier.  Both





                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2021                    45
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62