ITU's 160 anniversary

Committed to connecting the world

  •  
Girls in ICT day 2025

ITU-T work programme

Home : ITU-T Home : ITU-T Work Programme : G.9943     
  ITU-T A.5 justification information for referenced document BBF TR-369 Issue 1 Amendement 1 in draft G.9943
1. Clear description of the referenced document:
Name: BBF TR-369 Issue 1 Amendement 1
Title: User Services Platform protocol Issue:1 Amendment 1
2. Status of approval:
Approved
3. Justification for the specific reference:
This document deals with the management of home networks. This reference is needed to manage external technology not specified in ITU-T.
4. Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
None.
5. Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
The Broadband Forum has produced a new standard that represents an evolution from TR-069, called the “User Services Platform” (USP), defined in TR-369. We recommend that any documents that reference BBF management standards in an agnostic way also reference this as it has significant improvements and advantages over TR-069.
6. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
TR-369 Issue 1, Amendment 1 was approved in January 2019
7. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
TR-369 is evolved from TR-069. The set consists of TR-069, TR-104, TR-106, TR-135, TR-140, TR-143, TR-157, TR-181 Issue 2, and TR-196.
8. Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
[1] RFC 2119, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt/
[2] TR-046, Auto-Configuration Architecture & Framework, Broadband Forum/
Technical Report/
[3] TR-062, Auto-Configuration for the Connection Between the DSL Broadband/
Network Termination (B-NT) and the Network using ATM, Broadband Forum/
Technical Report/
[4] TR-044, Auto-Configuration for Basic Internet (IP-based) Services, Broadband/
Forum Technical Report/
The following references are associated with required components of the CPE WAN/
Management Protocol./
[5] RFC 1034, Domain names – concepts and facilities,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1034.txt/
[6] RFC 7230, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7230.txt/
[7] RFC 7231, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7231.txt/
[8] RFC 7235, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7235.txt/
[9] RFC 7616, HTTP Digest Access Authentication, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7616.txt/
[10] RFC 7617, The 'Basic' HTTP Authentication Scheme,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7617.txt/
[11] RFC 6265, HTTP State Management Mechanism, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6265.txt/
[12] Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTESOAP-20000508/
[13] Organizationally Unique Identifiers (OUIs), http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/OUI.html/
[14] RFC 5246, The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol, Version 1.2,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5246.txt/
[15] RFC 3986, Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt/
CPE WAN Management Protocol TR-069 Issue 1 Amendment 6/
March 2018 © The Broadband Forum. All rights reserved. Page 77 of 276/
[16] TR-106, Data Model Template for TR-069-Enabled Devices, Broadband Forum/
Technical Report/
The following references are associated with optional or recommended components of/
the CPE WAN Management Protocol./
[17] RFC 2132, DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2132.txt/
[18] XML-Signature Syntax and Processing, http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig/
[19] PKCS #7, Cryptographic Message Syntax Standard,/
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/pkcs/pkcs-7/index.html or/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2315.txt/
[20] Port Numbers, http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers/
[21] IANA Private Enterprise Numbers registry,/
http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers/
[22] RFC 2104, HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2104.txt/
[23] RFC 2131, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2131.txt/
[24] RFC 3489, STUN - Simple Traversal of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) Through/
Network Address Translators (NATs), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3489.txt/
[25] RFC 3925, Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration/
Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3925.txt/
[26] HTML 4.01 Specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
[27] TR-098, Internet Gateway Device Data Model for TR-069, Broadband Forum/
Technical Report (DEPRECATED)/
[28] TR-104, Provisioning Parameters for VoIP CPE, Broadband Forum Technical/
Report/
[29] TR-135, Data Model for a TR-069 Enabled STB, Broadband Forum Technical/
Report/
[30] TR-140 Issue 1.1, TR-069 Data Model for Storage Service Enabled Devices,/
Broadband Forum Technical Report/
[31] TR-143, Enabling Network Throughput Performance Tests and Statistical/
Monitoring, Broadband Forum Technical Report/
[32] TR-157, Component Objects for CWMP, Broadband Forum Technical Report/
[33] TR-196, Femto Access Point Service Data Model, Broadband Forum Technical/
Report/
[34] TR-181 Issue 1, Device Data Model for TR-069, Broadband Forum Technical/
Report (DEPRECATED)/
CPE WAN Management Protocol TR-069 Issue 1 Amendment 6/
March 2018 © The Broadband Forum. All rights reserved. Page 78 of 276/
[35] TR-181 Issue 2, Device Data Model for TR-069, Broadband Forum Technical/
Report/
[36] RFC 5389, Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN),/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5389.txt/
[37] RFC 4122, A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt/
[38] RFC 3315, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3315.txt/
[39] IEEE 802a, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Overview/
and Architecture - Amendment 1: Ethertypes for Prototype and Vendor-Specific/
Protocol Development./
[40] RFC 6120, Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6120.txt/
[41] tr-157-1-8.xml, Component Objects for CWMP, Broadband Forum,/
http://www.broadband-forum.org/cwmp/tr-157-1-8.xml/
[42] UPnP IGD v1, UPnP InternetGatewayDevice:1 Device Template, UPnP Forum,/
http://upnp.org/specs/gw/UPnP-gw-InternetGatewayDevice-v1-Device.pdf/
[43] UPnP IGD v2, UPnP InternetGatewayDevice:2 Device Template, UPnP Forum,/
http://upnp.org/specs/gw/UPnP-gw-InternetGatewayDevice-v2-Device.pdf/
[44] UPnP WAN PPP v1, UPnP WANPPPConnection:1 Service, UPnP Forum,/
http://upnp.org/specs/gw/UPnP-gw-WANPPPConnection-v1-Service.pdf/
[45] UPnP WAN IP v2, UPnP WANIPConnection:2 Service, UPnP Forum,/
http://upnp.org/specs/gw/UPnP-gw-WANIPConnection-v2-Service.pdf/
[46] UPnP WAN IPv6 FW v1, UPnP WANIPv6FirewallControl:1 Service, UPnP/
Forum, http://upnp.org/specs/gw/UPnP-gw-WANIPv6FirewallControl-v1-/
Service.pdf/
[47] RFC 6092, Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premise/
Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Services,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6092.txt/
[48] TR-124 Issue 3, Functional Requirements for Broadband Residential Gateway/
Devices, Broadband Forum Technical Report/
[49] RFC 6125, Representation and Verification of Domain-Based Application Service/
Identity within Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) Certificates/
in the Context of Transport Layer Security (TLS),/
https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6125.txt/
[50] RFC 6066, Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions,/
https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6066.txt./
[51] RFC 5077, Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without Server-Side/
State, https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5077.txt./
CPE WAN Management Protocol TR-069 Issue 1 Amendment 6/
March 2018 © The Broadband Forum. All rights reserved. Page 79 of 276/
[52] RFC 4180, Common Format and MIME Type for Comma-Separated Values (CSV)/
Files, https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4180.txt/
[53] RFC 7159, The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format,/
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7159.txt/
[54] OWASP, Cross-site Scripting, https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Crosssite_Scripting_(XSS)/
[55] OWASP, Cross-Site Request Forgery, https://www.owasp.org/index.php/CrossSite_Request_Forgery_(CSRF)/
[56] RFC 7525, Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS)/
and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7525.txt/
[57] RFC 7568, Deprecating Secure Sockets Layer Version 3.0,/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7568.txt/
[58] RFC 7395, An Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) Subprotocol/
for WebSocket, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7395.txt
9. Qualification of Broadband Forum:
The Broadband Forum was qualified in accordance with ITU-T A.4 and ITU-T A.5 on 27 January 2010.
10. Other (for any supplementary information):
None.
Note: This form is based on Recommendation ITU-T A.5