1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
Published as IETF Proposed Standard.
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
4001 is referenced in 7.1 Role of PIB,
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=4001
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
This document is an update of RFC 3291 and RFC 2851 before that. It and its predecessors are widely referenced in MIB and PIB documents.
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
There is no work currently in progress to modify this document. The last update was relatively minor.
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
Defines basic objects used in many MIBs.
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999./
McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999./
McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999./
Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003./
Deering, S., Haberman, B., Jinmei, T., Nordmark, E., and B. Zill, "IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture", RFC 4007, February 2005./
Informational references:/
Gilligan, R., Thomson, S., Bound, J., and W. Stevens, "Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6", RFC 2553, March 1999./
McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000./
Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002./
Daniele, M. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Transport Addresses", RFC 3419, December 2002./
|
9.
|
Qualification of
ISOC/IETF:
|
|
9.1-9.6 Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7 The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8 Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4001.txt
|
|