|
1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
IETF RFC 6282 (2011)
|
|
Title:
|
Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
|
Normative
|
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
|
G.cmsr supports the new header compression format given in RFC 6282.
|
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
|
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=6282
|
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
|
This RFC has been in existence since 2011.
|
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
|
RFC 6282 was published January, 2001. It is a standards-track document. Current standards status of this document can be found at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html.
|
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
|
Updates RFC 4944.
|
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
|
[RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,/
August 1980./
/
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate/
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
/
[RFC2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol,/
Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460,/
December 1998./
/
[RFC2474] Nichols, K., Blake, S., Baker, F., and D. Black,/
"Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS/
Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers", RFC 2474,/
December 1998./
/
[RFC3168] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The/
Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to/
IP", RFC 3168, September 2001./
/
[RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing/
Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006./
/
[RFC4944] Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., and D./
Culler, "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE/
802.15.4 Networks", RFC 4944, September 2007./
/
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing/
an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,/
RFC 5226, May 2008./
/
[RFC6275] Perkins, C., Ed., Johnson, D., and J. Arkko,/
"Mobility Support in IPv6", RFC 6275, July 2011./
|
|
9.
|
Qualification of
ISOC/IETF:
|
|
|
9.1-9.6 Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7 The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8 Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
|
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
|
None
|
|
