Testing AI Governance Before Deployment: A Multistakeholder Simulation Sandbox for Policy Stress-Testing


Bath Spa University

Session 381

Tuesday, 7 July 2026 17:00–17:45 (UTC+02:00) Physical (on-site) and Virtual (remote) participation Room T103, ITU Tower Building Interactive Session 1 Document
Register »

Physical (on-site) and Virtual (remote) participation


AI governance frameworks, policies, treaties, and multilateral agreements, are routinely developed without being tested under the conditions in which they must actually function.  Tabletop exercises rehearse operational decision chains.  No equivalent methodology exists for the governance layer itself.  The result is a structural gap: frameworks are assumed to work until a grey zone/"under the threshold" crisis proves otherwise.

Auracelle AI Governance Labs, in partnership with Bath Spa University, has developed a methodology to close this gap: asynchronous stress-tested governance wargaming.  Rather than testing who responds and how fast, it tests whether the governance framework itself, the policy, the treaty clause, the regulatory provision, holds under adversarial pressure, coalition fracture, and real-time adversarial shock.

WSIS+20 arrives at a moment when AI is already shaping escalation dynamics, disinformation environments, logistics networks, and institutional trust, faster than governance frameworks can adapt.  The vision this session advances is straightforward: governance frameworks should stress-test.  Simulation is the missing institutional layer.  It provides the evidence base for policymakers, treaty negotiators, and standards bodies to make informed decisions about the resilience of the rules they are building.

Topics
Artificial Intelligence Capacity Building Cultural Diversity Cybersecurity Digital Transformation Emerging Technologies Ethics Global Digital Compact (GDC) Machine Learning Smart Cities WSIS+20 Review
WSIS Action Lines
  • AL C1 logo C1. The role of governments and all stakeholders in the promotion of ICTs for development
  • AL C5 logo C5. Building confidence and security in use of ICTs
  • AL C6 logo C6. Enabling environment
  • AL C7 E–GOV logo C7. ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life — E-government
  • AL C7 E–SCI logo C7. ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life — E-science
  • AL C10 logo C10. Ethical dimensions of the Information Society
  • AL C11 logo C11. International and regional cooperation

This session directly advances C5 by developing and empirically testing a replicable methodology for identifying governance vulnerabilities in AI policy frameworks before they are deployed, and after in crisis conditions.  It contributes to C6 by demonstrating that enabling environments for AI require not just regulatory drafting but systematic resilience testing.  It connects to C10 through its focus on the ethical integrity of AI governance provisions, including whistleblower protections, transparency mandates, and enforcement mechanisms, under adversarial stress.  C1 and C11 are engaged through the multi-stakeholder architecture of the simulation itself, which convenes government, civil society, industry, academic, and military actors across geographies and time zones through an AI contested negotiation table.  C7 E-government is addressed through the direct application of simulation outputs to policy design and treaty drafting processes.

Sustainable Development Goals
  • Goal 9 logo Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
  • Goal 16 logo Goal 16: Promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies
  • Goal 17 logo Goal 17: Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

Goal 16 is the primary connection: just, peaceful, and inclusive societies require governance institutions that function under pressure. Stress-tested governance simulation provides the empirical foundation to build and validate those institutions before they face real-world failure.  Goal 9 is engaged through the development of a novel, replicable simulation infrastructure that enables governance innovation across policy domains including cyber, nuclear, AI, and space.  Goal 17 is directly served by the multi-stakeholder, cross-institutional design of the Auracelle Suite, which is built for cross-geography collaboration between universities, think tanks, defense research institutions, international organizations, and civil society, generating shared, comparable governance research data across sessions.

GDC Objectives
  • Objective 3: Foster an inclusive, open, safe and secure digital space that respects, protects and promotes human rights
  • Objective 4: Advance responsible, equitable and interoperable data governance approaches
  • Objective 5: Enhance international governance of artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity
Links

Grace-Alice.Evans25@bathspa.ac.uk
YouTube demonstration: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nTznkPu_Dco&feature=shared
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/grace-alice-evans-5a9632a3