Page 188 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024

2024 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference

REFERENCES [19] S. Ramraj, N. Uzir, R. Sunil, and S. Banerjee, “Experimenting
xgboost algorithm for prediction and classification of different
datasets,” International Journal of Control Theory and Applica-
[1] K. C. Rath, A. Khang, and D. Roy, “The role of internet of tions, vol. 9, no. 40, pp. 651–662, 2016.
things (iot) technology in industry 4.0 economy,” in Advanced [20] A. Kamal, M. G. R. Alam, M. R. Hassan, T. S. Apon, and
IoT Technologies and Applications in the Industry 4.0 Digital M. M. Hassan, “Explainable indoor localization of ble devices
Economy. CRC Press, 2024, pp. 1–28. through rssi using recursive continuous wavelet transformation
[2] M. Nassereddine and A. Khang, “Applications of internet of and xgboost classifier,” Future Generation Computer Systems,
things (iot) in smart cities,” in Advanced IoT Technologies and vol. 141, pp. 230–242, 2023.
Applications in the Industry 4.0 Digital Economy. CRC Press, [21] C. Jain, G. V. S. Sashank, S. Markkandan et al., “Low-cost ble
2024, pp. 109–136. based indoor localization using rssi fingerprinting and machine
[3] F. Zafari, A. Gkelias, and K. K. Leung, “A survey of indoor learning,” in 2021 sixth international conference on wireless
localization systems and technologies,” IEEE Communications communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET).
Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2568–2599, 2019. IEEE, 2021, pp. 363–367.
[4] J. Leng, W. Sha, B. Wang, P. Zheng, C. Zhuang, [22] E. Jedari, Z. Wu, R. Rashidzadeh, and M. Saif, “Wi-fi based
Q. Liu, T. Wuest, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, indoor location positioning employing random forest classifier,”
“Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect,” Journal of in 2015 international conference on indoor positioning and
Manufacturing Systems, vol. 65, pp. 279–295, 2022. indoor navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–5.
[Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ [23] M. T. Hoang, Y. Zhu, B. Yuen, T. Reese, X. Dong, T. Lu,
article/pii/S0278612522001662 R. Westendorp, and M. Xie, “A soft range limited k-nearest
[5] M. Sharma, A. Tomar, and A. Hazra, “Edge computing for neighbors algorithm for indoor localization enhancement,” IEEE
industry 5.0: fundamental, applications and research challenges,” Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 10 208–10 216, 2018.
IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024. [24] R. Wang, H. Luo, Q. Wang, Z. Li, F. Zhao, and J. Huang, “A spa-
[6] A. Yassin, Y. Nasser, M. Awad, A. Al-Dubai, R. Liu, C. Yuen, tial–temporal positioning algorithm using residual network and
R. Raulefs, and E. Aboutanios, “Recent advances in indoor lo- lstm,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,
calization: A survey on theoretical approaches and applications,” vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 9251–9261, 2020.
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. [25] A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a
1327–1346, 2016. multivalued mapping,” in Classic works of the Dempster-Shafer
[7] G. I. Hapsari, R. Munadi, B. Erfianto, and I. D. Irawati, “Future theory of belief functions. Springer, 2008, pp. 57–72.
research and trends in ultra-wideband indoor tag localization,” [26] G. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton
IEEE Access, 2024. university press, 1976, vol. 42.
[8] C. Lyu, X. Hu, Z. Niu, B. Yang, J. Jin, and C. Ge, “A light-weight [27] A. Achroufene, A. Chibani, and Y. Amirat, “Using dempster-
neural network for marine acoustic signal recognition suitable for shafer theory for rss-based indoor localization,” pp. 1–8, 2020.
fiber-optic hydrophones,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. [28] P. Kasebzadeh, G.-S. Granados, and E. S. Lohan, “Indoor local-
235, p. 121235, 2024. ization via wlan path-loss models and dempster-shafer combin-
[9] R. Kumar, S. Singh, and V. K. Chaurasiya, “A low-cost and effi- ing,” pp. 1–6, 2014.
cient spatial–temporal model for indoor localization “h-lstmf”,” [29] R. Kumar, J. Torres-Sospedra, and V. K. Chaurasiya, “Datasets
IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6117–6128, 2023. for indoor positioning with single-ap wi-fi fingerprinting,” 2023.
[10] B. Soner and S. Coleri, “Visible light communication based
vehicle localization for collision avoidance and platooning,” IEEE
Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 2167–
2180, 2021.
[11] B. Yang, L. Guo, R. Guo, M. Zhao, and T. Zhao, “A novel
trilateration algorithm for rssi-based indoor localization,” IEEE
Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 8164–8172, 2020.
[12] I. Toy, A. Durdu, and A. Yusefi, “Localization using two different
imu sensor-based dead reckoning system,” in 2024 23rd Interna-
tional Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH). IEEE,
2024, pp. 1–5.
[13] R. Greer, A. Gopalkrishnan, M. Keskar, and M. M. Trivedi,
“Patterns of vehicle lights: Addressing complexities of camera-
based vehicle light datasets and metrics,” Pattern Recognition
Letters, vol. 178, pp. 209–215, 2024.
[14] B. Wang, Q. Chen, L. T. Yang, and H.-C. Chao, “Indoor smart-
phone localization via fingerprint crowdsourcing: Challenges and
approaches,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 3, pp.
82–89, 2016.
[15] N. Swangmuang and P. Krishnamurthy, “Location fingerprint
analyses toward efficient indoor positioning,” in 2008 Sixth
Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing
and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 2008, pp. 100–109.
[16] K. Zia, H. Iram, M. Aziz-ul Haq, and A. Zia, “Comparative study
of classification techniques for indoor localization of mobile
devices,” pp. 1–5, 2018.
[17] Y.-Y. Song and L. Ying, “Decision tree methods: applications for
classification and prediction,” Shanghai archives of psychiatry,
vol. 27, no. 2, p. 130, 2015.
[18] S. Suthaharan and S. Suthaharan, “Decision tree learning,” Ma-
chine Learning Models and Algorithms for Big Data Classifica-
tion: Thinking with Examples for Effective Learning, pp. 237–
269, 2016.

– 144 –