Page 24 - Smart public health emergency management and ICT implementations - A U4SSC deliverable on city platforms
P. 24

5       Case study and examples



            5.1     Seoul, South Korea

            South Korea flattened the curve of rising coronavirus cases in the country within two months of
            the outbreak. It did a remarkable job of fully curing 92 per cent of the more than 15,000 infected
            citizens, keeping the death count at just 305 nationally. In the capital, Seoul, there were 1,841
            confirmed cases with 13 deaths as of 15 August 2020 . South Korea, like the United States, saw its
                                                                 61
            first case on 20 January 2020. However, the death toll in the US reached 170,000, with the number
            of confirmed cases at 5.4 million. A year later, by August 2021, the number of Covid-19 cases in
            the United States had risen to an estimated 36.5 million with 620,000 fatalities. In South Korea, the
            case numbers for the corresponding period stood at 220,000 with 2,144 recorded fatalities.    62,63
            These disparities have attracted much attention. South Korea may seem like one of a number of
            Asian countries, including Singapore and China, which have so far managed to successfully flatten
            the curve. However, it is the only country that did not suspend everyday activities. According to
            the late Park Won-soon, Mayor of Seoul, Korean success lies in the “promptness and transparency”
            applied by the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) in conducting tracing, testing and operating
            24-hour quarantine countermeasures from the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as
            by the role played by its citizens, whom he described as “Seoul’s Vaccine”. How did “promptness
            and transparency” turn South Korea, and Seoul specifically, into the poster child for state officials
            and policy-makers fighting this global crisis, and what role did the smart city endeavours play in
            controlling this virus?


            Promptness in tackling the virus is a result of years of preparedness since the Middle East
            Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in 2015, preceded a year earlier by the sinking of the
            Sewol Ferry in 2014. The impacts of both were worsened by the lack of government transparency,
            making both speed and communication key to facing future crises. The result was an evolving
            three-pronged approach to combating Covid-19, consisting of an extensive social distancing and
            public hygiene campaign, a comprehensive medical strategy, and public-private partnerships.
            This was enabled by an advanced infrastructure and innovative economy forming the basis of
            the smart city. Notwithstanding the fundamental role played by technology and speed in testing,
            tracing and treating, it was an underlying trust in leadership combined with the centralized mode
            of governance that proved critical to the handling of this pandemic. Though this modus operandi
            remains unchanged, the number of confirmed Covid-19 cases spiked in the second half of August
            2020, forcing the government to sound the alarm and revert to stricter social distance measures. It is
            not clear whether this was attributed to the long predicted second wave of the virus, or to the effect
            of the change in leadership (following Park Won-soon’s suicide in July 2020) and consequently of
            the changed relationship between the government and the people.












             14  U4SSC: Smart public health emergency management and ICT implementations
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29