Page 96 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 6 – Wireless communication systems in beyond 5G era
P. 96

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 6




          “smart  radio  environments”  as  a  means  of       Based  on  the  above  motivation,  we  propose  a
          propagation path control by IRS reflectors. It also   massive distributed IRS based on a 1-bit control IRS
          models  the  basic  characteristics  of  IRS  reflectors   reflector with few elements in which all elements
          and clarifies the differences with other relay-system   can be controlled for reflection (ON) or penetration
          devices.  Furthermore,  as  specific  use  cases,  there   (OFF) at the same time. Although 1-bit control is a
          are intelligent walls [4-6] and hyper-surfaces [7-9].   rough control, the squared power gain is asymptotic
          An  intelligent  wall  is  an  IRS  reflector  that  can   to  that  of  continuous  control  even  for  1-bit
          enable/disable reflection and control phase [0, π]   controlled  IRS  in  [14].  Instead  of  controlling  the
          with respect to the incident radio wave. It can be   amplitude and phase parameters for each element
          achieved using a PIN diode or variable resonator.    of  the  IRS  reflector,  this  paper  proposes  a
          Hyper-surfaces,  meanwhile,  centrally  control  IRS   formulation  to  select  the  ON/OFF  combination  of
          reflectors through a control unit equipped with an   IRS reflectors. In particular, we formulate the joint
          IoT gateway. In addition, a propagation path control   ON/OFF  IRS  selection  method  and  interference
          is   being   theoretically   formulated   as   a     suppression  as  a  non-linear  binary  integer
          programmable wireless environment in which the       programming  problem.  We  then  solve  the
          maximizing  of  received  signal  intensity  and  the   formulated problem of IRS reflectors ON/OFF using
          minimizing of maximum delay spread are objective     the  optimization  solver  while  maintaining  the
          functions.                                           interference  level  below  a  certain  threshold.
                                                               Further, a clustering method of IRS reflector is also
          Past studies have targeted a single, relatively large
          area IRS reflector, but to improve the performance   proposed to reduce the computational complexity
          of  an  entire  wireless  service  area  beyond  indoor   during  the  massive  deployment  of  IRS.  The
          environments  and  certain  small  areas,  there  are   proposed  method  performs  clustering  IRS
          also  reports  of  obtaining  even  better  effects  by   reflectors having similar characteristics and selects
          deploying and controlling distributed IRS reflectors   only  the  representative  value  of  a  cluster  as  a
          at  multiple  locations  [10][11].  There  are  also   combination candidate to keep computational costs
          studies on maximizing the  channel  capacity of  all   constant even in the case of many IRS reflectors. We
          single-antenna terminals by jointly optimizing the   evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method
          phase control of distributed IRS reflectors and base-  using simulation and experimental data.
          station beam-forming control [12][13]. In order to   The  rest  of  this  paper  is  organized  as  follows.
          flexibly meet various requirements such as higher    Section 2 describes the system model used in this
          transmission capacity and reliability in the beyond   study and formulates the problem of  suppressing
          5G  era,  it  is  necessary  to  expand  to  "massive"   interference  by  selecting  IRS  reflectors.  Section  3
          distributed  IRS  aided  wireless  communication  as   describes  the  method  of  clustering  IRS  reflectors
          envisioned in this paper.                            proposed  in  this  paper.  Section  4  evaluates  the
                                                               performance of the proposed method by computer
          On  the  other  hand,  a  distributed  arrangement
          means a very large number of patterns in the way     simulation  and  compares  it  with  conventional
          that the control parameters of each IRS reflector can   clustering  methods.  Section  5  performs  an
          be  combined.  Most  of  the  previous  literature   evaluation using experimental data. Finally, Section
          assumes that the amplitude and phase parameters      6 concludes the paper.
          are continuously controlled for each element of the
          IRS  reflectors  [10-12].  However,  the  practical   2.   MASSIVE DISTRIBUTED IRS AIDED
          difficulty  lies  in  the  amount  of  time  required  for   WIRELESS COMMUNICATION WITH
          controlling and optimizing these and thus increases        ON/OFF SELECTION
          the  operational  complexity  of  IRS  reflectors  itself   2.1  System model
          [14]. In addition, the effects of interference caused
          by an increase in the number of propagation paths    As shown in Fig. 1, this paper considers a system
          must be considered in actual environments. To the    concept  where  Base  Stations  (BS)  and  User
          best  of  our  knowledge,  this  is  the  first  work  that   Equipment  (UE)  communicate  via  IRS  reflectors.
          performs  combinatorial  optimization  of  a  large   IRS reflectors are massively distributed, as they are
          number  of  IRS  reflectors  while  considering  this   installed on the roofs and walls of buildings. This
          interference.                                        environment  is  modeled  as  shown  in  Fig.  2.  The
                                                               same frequency is used here. This model consists of
                                                               sender S, receiver D, interfered receiver P, and IRS





          84                                 © International Telecommunication Union, 2021
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101