Page 69 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 6 – Wireless communication systems in beyond 5G era
P. 69

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 6







              MULTI‑TIER MULTI‑TENANT NETWORK SLICING: A MULTI‑DOMAIN GAMES APPROACH

                                                                    1
                                                 1
                            Sunday Oladayo Oladejo , Stephen Obono Ekwe , Lateef Adesola Akinyemi 1,2
          1 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, Department of Electronic and
                                                                                      2
                              Computer Engineering, Lagos State University, Epe, Lagos State, Nigeria
                              NOTE: Corresponding author: Sunday Oladayo Oladejo, oldsun002@myuct.ac.za



          Abstract – The 5G slice networks will play a critical role in meeting the stringent quality‑of‑service requirements of differ‑
          ent use cases, reducing the Capital Expenditure (CapEX) and Operational Expenditure (OpEX) of mobile network operators.
          Owing to the  lexibility and ability of 5G slice networks to meet the needs of different verticals, it attracts new network players
          and entities to the mobile network ecosystem, and therefore it creates new business models and structures. Motivated by this
          development, this paper addresses the dynamic resource allocation in a multi‑slice multi‑tier multi‑domain network with dif‑
          ferent network players. The dynamic resource allocation problem is formulated as a maximum utility optimisation problem
          from a multiplayer multi‑domain perspective. Furthermore, a 3‑level hierarchical business model comprising Infrastructure
          Providers (InPs), Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs), Service Providers (SPs), and slice users are investigated. We
          propose two schemes: a multi‑tier multi‑domain slice user matching game scheme and a distributed backtracking multiplayer
          multi‑domain game scheme in solving the transformed maximum utility optimisation problem. We compare the multi‑tier
          multi‑tenant multi‑domain game scheme with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) Intelligent Latency‑Aware Resource (GI‑LARE) al‑
          location scheme, and a static slicing resource allocation scheme via Monte Carlo simulation. Our  indings reveal that the
          proposed scheme signi icantly outperforms these other schemes.
          Keywords – 5G, multi‑domain, multi‑tenancy, MVNO, network slicing, resource allocation, SP

          1.   INTRODUCTION                                    The  multi‑domain  concept  for  NS  refers  to  the  pooling
                                                               of network resources from multiple InPs which are then
          The  Network  Slicing  (NS)  paradigm  entails  the  abstrac‑   virtualised  and  sliced  to  meet  the  needs  of  slice  users
          tion  of  the  physical  mobile  network  and  its  hard  re‑   and diverse verticals [7].  Verticals are business and pub‑
          sources  into  logical  autonomous  networks  via  network   lic entities that run their service applications on mobile
          softwarisation  technology  [1].  To  this  end,  it  has  been   networks.  Instances  of  verticals  are  defence  agencies,
          widely  acknowledged  that  NS  will  greatly  improve  the   transport systems, health institutions, power and energy
          resource  utilisation  of  the  mobile  networks  and  signi i‑   utilities,  disaster  and  emergency  agencies,  manufactur‑
          cantly reduces their Capital Expenditure (CapEx) and Op‑   ing,  and  agricultural  chains.  The  importance  of  multi‑
          erational Expenditure (OpEx). Consequently, efforts have   domain  NS  is  emphasised  in  resource  aggregation,  cov‑
          been  geared  towards  achieving  these  goals  through  di‑   erage area extension,  reliability of services,  and the op‑
          verse resource management frameworks, owing to com‑   portunity to further make the business model Incentive
          plex  business  models  of  NS.  However,  with  the   lexible   Compatible (IC) for network players [8, 9].  On the other
          and  agile  characterisation  of  NS  architecture,  its  busi‑   hand,  in the single domain model,  the NS resources are
          ness  model  departs  radically  from  the  traditional  mod‑   primarily from the virtualised resources of only one InP.
          els [2,  3,  4].  Hence,  new mobile entities such as Infras‑   A vast corpus of literature on NS has focused on the sin‑
          tructure Providers (InPs), Mobile Virtual Network Oper‑   gle domain model despite its non‑ lexibility and limited
          ators  (MVNOs),  Over‑the‑top  Providers  (OTTs),  Content   resource constraints which make it unsuitable for the fu‑
          Providers (CPs), Service Providers (SPs), Backhaul Oper‑   ture mobile networks [8, 10]. In Fig. 1(a)‑(c), we illustrate
          ators (BOs), and Vehicular‑Content Providers (VCPs) have   the  traditional,  single,  and  multi‑domains  multi‑tenant
          become critical industry players.                    NS  paradigms.  This  work  focuses  on  the  M‑TTSD  net‑
          To exploit the capabilities of 5G and beyond mobile net‑   work.  In a multi‑domain system, several InPs provide in‑
          works,  the  self‑interests  of  the  diverse  network  players   frastructure and network resources services, and to this
          would  have  to  be    iciently  managed.  To  this  end,  the   end, the infrastructure and network resources owned by
          challenge of managing network resources to achieve op‑   an InP represent a network domain.  The multi‑tenancy
          timal network performance and economic advantages to   paradigm entails several independent MVNOs (i.e., other‑
          the network players is non‑trivial.  This paper examines   wise known as tenants) share the same physical infras‑
          the resource allocation bottleneck in a Multi‑Tier multi‑   tructure  and  network  resources  owned  by  an  InP.  The
          Tenant  multi‑Slice  multi‑Domain  (M‑TTSD)  5G  and  be‑   term “tenants” may be extended to SP depending on the
          yond network [5, 6].  Speci ically, we consider an M‑TTSD
          5G network model with a business model consisting of SP,
          MVNO, InP, and slice users.



                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2021                    57
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74