Page 102 - ITU KALEIDOSCOPE, ATLANTA 2019
P. 102

2019 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference




                     Table 2 – The average execution time for each action in seconds and the percentage of improvement

                           Action           A1    A2    A3    A4    A5     A6     A7    Avg. Improvement
                                 Current    2.5   5.0   14.9  6.0   5.7    3.4   55.8
                    Desktop     Proposed    1.7   3.4   14.5  4.3   3.6    3.3   40.2        32%

                              Improvement   47%   47%   3%    40%   58%    3%    39%
                                 Current    3.0   5.5   12.9  7.0   13.1   11    69.8
                  Smartphone
                                Proposed    3.3   5.0   13.7  6.5   7.0    3.3    58         34%

                              Improvement   -9%   10%   -6%   8%    87%   233%   20%




























                        Figure 7 – Comparison of Task Execution Time. C: Current Interface, P: Proposed Interface


           tasks. The actionable items in the rows of the result table need  6.3 Needs in the Near Future
           to be effectively reorganized. As shown in the bottom-right
           of Figure 5, the user has to swipe right to access the view,  A system administrator in Cameroon reported that 75% of
           update, and delete buttons in the result table, which are the  the participants preferred working with tablets if the screen
           essential functions of the page. Overall, we recommend that  was large enough, and 25% of them were approved the use
           designers and developers of LIS should carefully consider  of smartphones to access the laboratory data. We also found
           their specific target users, goals, and workflows. One way to  similar needs in Section 2; 42% of nurses in Nigeria preferred
           do so is to consult with end-users and system administrators  to use mobile devices such as iPad, Tablet PC, or Android
           before designing the user interface.               Phones. Future studies should collect qualitative data to
                                                              see where these preferences are coming from – aspirational
                                                              desires (i.e., preference for a modern device) or needs (better
                                                              portability throughout the clinic).
           6.2  Computing Environments


           As of May 2019, the most widely used browser in Africa  6.4 Interface Standard and Usability
           is Chrome for Android (35.09% in the market share), and
           the latest Chrome (Version 74.0) is also broadly adopted  Medical data exchange standards have been considered as
           (17.65%) [17]. In sharp contrast, there was one dominant  a central issue of hospital information systems, thus many
           operating condition when C4G BLIS was designed in 2011 -  researchers and organizations have attempted to develop
           Windows (81%), About 1024x768 screen resolution (51%),  efficient, inter-operable standards and protocols such as
           and Internet Explorer (15%) or Opera (11%) browsers. This  Health Level Seven (HL7), Clinical Document Architecture
           fact suggests that the user interfaces designed for the global  (CDA) and Continuity of Care Document (CCD), and
           south should be revisited so that they are stable, adaptive, and  Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED).
           responsive to their heterogeneous operating environments.  Several studies found that adopting such a standard could




                                                           – 82 –
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107