Page 638 - 5G Basics - Core Network Aspects
P. 638

2                                                 Transport aspects


            7.1     Single CPRI signal mapping into ODUk (k = 0, 1, flex(CBR))

            CPRI CBR signals ([CPRI] options 1 to 10) may be transported over an optical channel data unit-k (ODUk)
            connection. These CBR signals are mapped into a low order (LO) optical channel payload unit-k (OPUk) via
            the generic mapping procedure (GMP) as specified in clause 17.7 of [ITU-T G.709] for [CPRI] options 1 to 3
            and  via  the  bit-synchronous  mapping  procedure  as  specified  in  clause 17.9  of  [ITU-T  G.709]  for  [CPRI]
            options 4 to 10.

            Two [CPRI] signals (options 1 and 2) are transported via OPU0, one [CPRI] signal (option 3) is transported
            via OPU1 and the remaining [CPRI] signals (options 4 to 10) are transported via OPUflex. The GMP Cm and
            Cn (n = 1) values associated with the [CPRI] options 1 to 3 signals are presented in Tables 7-1a, 7-1b, 7-2a
            and 7-2b.
            The use of the "experimental mapping" payload type (code 0x01) is suggested.

            Further details are provided below:
            Simulation analyses were done for the transport of [CPRI] option 2, option 3 and option 4 clients over OTN
            for the following four cases:
            a)      Option 2 client signal → ODU0 → ODU2 → OTU2 → ODU2 → ODU0 → option 2 client signal
            b)      Option 3 client signal → ODU1 → ODU2 → OTU2 → ODU2 → ODU1 → option 3 client signal

            c)      Option 3 client signal → ODU1 → OTU1 → ODU1 → option 3
            d)      Option 4 client signal → ODU2 → OTU2 → ODU2 → option 4
            As described by this Supplement, the mappings of the [CPRI] option 2 client to ODU0 and the [CPRI] option
            3 client to ODU1 are via GMP. The [CPRI] option 4 client is mapped to ODUflex, and the ODUflex is mapped
            to ODU2 via GMP. Finally, in a) the ODU0 is mapped to ODU2 via GMP and in b) the ODU1 is mapped to
            ODU2 via asynchronous mapping procedure (AMP). Cases a) and b) have a single mapping of the CPRI client
            to  OTN  and  one  level  of OTN  multiplexing.  Cases c)  and  d)  have  a  single  mapping  to  OTN  and  no  OTN
            multiplexing.

            Simulations were run for no use of additional phase information for the CPRI client to LO ODU mapper (i.e.,
            Cn with n = 8) and 1 UI of additional phase information for the CPRI client to LO ODU mapper (i.e., Cn with
            n = 1). The desynchronizer bandwidth for the high order (HO) ODU to LO ODU demappers was 300 Hz.

            The simulation results indicated that, for CPRI client desynchronizer bandwidth in the range 100 to 300 Hz
            (current OTN client desynchronizers are 300 Hz or, in a few cases, 100 Hz or 200 Hz) RMS frequency offset
            ranges from approximately 113 ppb to 190 ppb for transport of [CPRI] option 2 for case a) and 156 ppb to
            317  ppb  for  transport of  [CPRI]  option  3  for  case b).  In  addition,  for  the  same  range  of  desynchronizer
            bandwidths, RMS frequency offset ranges from approximately 29 ppb to 116 ppb for [CPRI] option 3 for
            case c) and 32 ppb to 130 ppb for [CPRI] option 4 for case d).

            The simulation results also indicated that, for CPRI client desynchronizer bandwidth in the range 100 to
            300 Hz, peak-to-peak jitter ranges from approximately 6.9 to 14.2 unit intervals peak-to-peak (UIpp) for
            transport of [CPRI] option 2 for case a) and 6.7 to 14.1 UIpp for transport of [CPRI] option 3 for case b). In
            addition, for the same range of desynchronizer bandwidths, peak-to-peak jitter ranges from approximately
            0.8 to 7.2 UIpp for [CPRI] option 3 for case c) and 0.76 to 7.2 UIpp for [CPRI] option 4 for case d).

            In order to allow compatibility with OTN transport, CPRI remote equipment (RE) would need to be designed
            to  tolerate  and  filter  properly  at  least  the  noise  added  by  the  OTN  transport,  which  is  not  currently
            budgeted by CPRI. Additional sources of noise may also exist. The OTN network should also be designed in
            order to meet the applicable CPRI stringent symmetry requirements; this is something that has not been
            studied. Interworking between OTN and the CPRI RE, in terms of jitter and wander, is still unknown and has
            to be considered.

            The CPRI replacement signal is for further study.






            628
   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643