Page 631 - Shaping smarter and more sustainable cities - Striving for sustainable development goals
P. 631

Infrastructure sharing has the potential to (GSMA, 2008):

                      Lead  to  faster  and  wider  roll‐out  of  coverage  into  new  and  currently  underserved
                       geographical areas.

                      Reduce the number of antenna sites.
                      Reduce the energy and carbon footprint of mobile networks.
                      Reduce the environmental impact of mobile infrastructure on landscape.

                      Reduce costs for operators.
                      Optimize the use of the RF spectrum and increase data speeds through active sharing of
                       the frequencies.
            In some cases, site sharing increases competition by giving operators access to key sites necessary
            to compete on quality of service and coverage, thus sharing improves roaming. Governments may
            also consider positive incentives to roll out into underserved areas.

            In both passive and active sharing, it is necessary to consider the possible effects on RF exposure
            levels and compliance boundaries. As discussed in section 7.2, antennas that are close together or
            operating at higher powers may have overlapping compliance zones leading to a combined zone
            that  is  larger  than  the  individual  antenna  zones.  Antennas  that  are  shared  by  more  than  one
            operator may have higher combined transmitter powers.

            Nearby residents may think that a higher number of antennas in the surrounding areas will lead to
            higher exposure levels at the ground level in publicly accessible areas. Measurements undertaken
            in Germany demonstrated that neither distance to the antenna nor the number of visible antennas
            were  accurate  indicators  of  RF  exposure.  Instead,  the  orientation  of  the  antenna’s  main  lobe
            constitutes the main factor influencing exposure (Bornkessel et al., 2007).

            7.4     Location of antennas and access restrictions

            Wireless communication antennas should be positioned so that locations where the public exposure
            limits may be exceeded are not reasonably accessible to the general public. This can be achieved by
            selecting the location of the antenna or by the use of barriers to restrict access.

            Low  power  antenna  installations  and  wireless  access  points  have  no  or  limited  positioning
            requirements.  In  addition,  simple  guidance  may  be  provided  by  the  operator  or  equipment
            manufacturer.
            Higher power antennas are generally mounted above head height (sometimes on a short antenna
            mounting pole) or on the outer surface of buildings where it is not possible for the public to access
            areas in front of the antennas. Such antennas have directive antenna patterns that substantially
            decrease the exposure to directions above the horizon and to the ground near the antenna tower.
            When  locating  antennas,  an  assessment  of  the  size  of  the  EMF  compliance  zone  should  be
            conducted to determine whether the compliance zones could reach adjacent buildings. This could
            require  a  change  in  antenna  position  or  reduction  in  transmitter  power  in  order  to  ensure
            compliance with the EMF limits (Recommendation ITU‐T K.70, 2007).














            ITU‐T's Technical Reports and Specifications                                                  621
   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636