Page 114 - ITU Kaleidoscope 2016

2016 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference

is another instance of collective action that requires [5] F. Beltrán, S.K. Ray, and J. and Gutiérrez, “Understanding
coordination between bidders over the course of the the current operation and future roles of wireless networks:
auction, a situation hard to deal with in the context of Co-existence, competition and co-operation in the unlicensed
auction rules that protect anonymity of bidding. In its two- spectrum bands”, accepted for publication in Journal of
stage auction design Ofcom had proposed three ways to Selected Areas of Communications, (2016).
deal with coordination: a) to allow negotiations between [6] M.M. Bykowsky, W.W. Sharkey, and M., Olson, “A Market-
Based Approach to Establishing Licensing Rules: Licensed
winners of the first auction stage, b) to allow joint bidding versus Unlicensed Use of Spectrum”, US Federal
on the second stage, and, c) to allow bids in the second Communications Commission, OSP Paper 43, (2008).
stage contingent on knowing the identity of potential https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/working-
neighbours (neighbouring bands). We identified significant papers/market-based-approach-establishing-licensing-rules-
downsides with each option such that we did not favour any licensed-versus
of them. Eventually for its 2013 auction, due to lack of [7] M. Cave, C. Doyle, and W. Webb, “Essentials of Modern
support from respondents and no alternative provisions Spectrum Management”, Cambridge University Press (2007).
suggested, Ofcom decided not to facilitate joint bidding or [8] R.H. Coase, “The Federal Communications”, Journal of Law
spectrum sharing. and Economics, (1959), 2:1-40.
[9] European Commission, “Promoting the shared use of
Europe's radio spectrum”. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-
6. CONCLUSIONS market/en/promoting-shared-use-europes-radio-spectrum
(2016). (last access, April 28, 2016).
[10] Y. Han, E. Ekicia, H. Kremo, and O. Altintasc, “Spectrum
The modern role of spectrum managers has drastically sharing methods for the coexistence of multiple RF systems:
become even more challenging as demand for spectrum has A survey”, Ad-Hoc Networks, In-print.
increased remarkably over recent years. Bandwidth-hungry [11] J. A. Larbi-Apau, and J. L. Moseley, “Performance-based
applications and devices seek to get connected over the measurement: Action for organizations and HPT
airwaves is dismal numbers but the availability of spectrum accountability”, Perf. Improv., (2010), 49: 7–17.
is not keeping up with demand. This paper argues a renewed [12] R. Lipsey, K.I. Carlaw, and C.T. Bekhar, Economic
Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long
role for spectrum sharing needs to be embraced by spectrum Term Economic Growth, Oxford University Press, (2005).
authorities as other managerial decisions such as [13] MBIE Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
reallocation, clearing of non-highly used bands and Managed Spectrum Parks Allocation Rules. New Zealand
refarming are not enough. In doing so spectrum Government, (2010) www.rsm.govt.nz
management is continuously expected to be serve as the [14] P., Milgrom, J. Levin, and A. Eilat, “The case for unlicensed
vehicle deployed to maximise the value of spectrum, its spectrum”. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
efficient utilisation and its benefits to society. Discussion Paper No. 10-036. (2011).
[15] Ofcom, “A framework for spectrum sharing”, available at
Spectrum sharing can enhance the spectrum authority’s http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/spect
capabilities with a management scheme aimed to increase rum-sharing-framework/statement/statement.pdf (2016).
the effectiveness of allocations and the effectiveness of Last access April 24, 2016.
assignments. Market-based mechanisms that include auction [16] Ofcom, “Second Consultation on assessment of future mobile
for the assignment of rights to share the spectrum are not competition and proposals for the award of 800 MHz and 2.6
only conceivable but possibly efficient ways to decide about GHz spectrum and related issues”,
the best use and user of the spectrum [5]. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/awar
d-800mhz/summary/combined-award-2.pdf (2012). Last
If spectrum management creates conditions for efficient access May 30, 2016.
allocation and assignment through spectrum sharing, it will [17] PCAST, Report to the President: Realizing the Full Potential
be fueling the connection between policy and markets that of Government-held spectrum to spur economic growth,
make ICT a pervasive factor in a wide range of economic (2012).
sectors, a booster for complementary innovations and a [18] A. Rincon, M. Vecchi, and F. Venturini, “ICT as a General
generator of important spillover effects. Purpose Technology: Spillovers, Absorptive Capacity and
Productivity Performance”, UK NIESR Discussion Paper
416, (2013).
REFERENCES [19] SCF Associates, “Perspectives on the value of shared
access”, Final report for the European Commission, (2012).
[1] P. Aghion, P. Howitt, and G.L. Violante, “General Purpose
Technologies and Within-group Inequality”, Journal of
Economic Growth, (2012), 7: 315.
[2] P. Barwise, M. Cave, P. Culham, T. Lavender, N. Pratt, and
D. Tambini, “Incorporating Social Value into Spectrum
Allocation Decisions”, A report for UK Department for
Culture, Media and Sport, (2015).
[3] C. Bazelon, and G. McHenry, “Spectrum Sharing: Taxonomy
and Economics”, The Brattle Group, (2014).
[4] C. Bazelon, and G. McHenry, “Spectrum Value”,
Telecommunications Policy, (2013), 37: 737-747.

– 96 –