Page 57 - Procurement guidelines for smart sustainable cities - A U4SSC deliverable
P. 57

“COVID-19 has made people aware of the costs of bad buying. The costs of getting it wrong have
                been uniquely apparent.”


                                            Gavin Hayman, Executive Director, Open Contracting Partnership


            Next steps


            Since the release of the public monitoring tool, more than 45 corruption-related investigations
            (Buenos Aires Times, 2020) have been launched in Ecuador, with an estimated loss of more than
            USD 12 million in overpayments.


            As well as improving the data issues in the tool, the SDP report recommended changing Ecuador's
            procurement regulations to take account of emergency situations and prevent another crisis being
            abused in the future.


            3.3     How to maintain standards


            Ensure  the integrity  of contracts  awarded during  a  crisis  through effective monitoring and
            transparent processes.


            Overview

            Crisis situations can provide the conditions for fraud or corruption to take place in public-sector
            buying. Financial controls are often reduced, funding levels can soar and there is immense pressure
            on buyers to act and be seen to act by the public and media.


            To help maintain ethical and financial standards during an emergency, buyers need to ensure:

            •  fair and reasonable pricing;

            •  transparency and accountability;
            •  a clear roadmap or plan to return to “normal” or sustainable buying.



            3.3.1  Ensure value for money


            Make sure that products and services bought during an emergency meet minimum standards.
















                                                             Procurement guidelines for smart sustainable cities | May 2023  43
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62