Page 85 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 4 – AI and machine learning solutions in 5G and future networks
P. 85

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 4




          Fig. 1 shows a snapshot of the 5 GHz band in Wi‑Fi (partic‑  • Probabilistic Uniform (PU): as an alternative to
          ularly, U‑NII‑1 and U‑NII‑2 bands are shown), where ba‑  SCB and AM, PU is introduced to add some random‑
          sic 20 MHz channels can be bonded to form wider chan‑    ness in the process of picking free channels, so that
          nels of up to 160 MHz. Each allowed channel is repre‑    any combination is chosen with the same probabil‑
          sented by an identi ier. For instance, channel 36 is the  ity. This policy has been shown to improve both SCB
           irst 20 MHz channel in the U‑NII‑1 band. As can be ap‑  and AM in some scenarios in which  low starvation
          preciated, the number of combinations for bonding chan‑  was present due to inter‑BSS interactions.
          nels is high, even for a small portion of the available
                  1
          spectrum and under the constraint that only contigu‑  To better illustrate the behavior of CB policies, Fig. 3
          ous channels can be bonded. Moreover, novel bonding  shows a simpli ication of the transmission procedure that
          techniques combine Orthogonal Frequency Multiple Ac‑  a Station (STA) follows when implementing AM. In par‑
          cess (OFDMA) with preamble puncturing [9] to use non‑  ticular, CB may be applied over channels 1‑4. Based on
          contiguous channels. With all this, given the number of  the AM policy, at time    , the STA can transmit only over
                                                                                   1
          Basic Service Sets (BSSs) and devices in crowded deploy‑  channel 2, which is the only one that is sensed free at
          ments (see Fig. 2), we can say that CB is a problem with a  the moment of initiating a transmission. Similarly, in    ,
                                                                                                              2
          combinatorial action space.                          both channels 1 and 2 are found free, so the transmission
                                                               is performed over those two channels. Finally, provided
                                                               that the entire spectrum is free, a transmission over chan‑
                                                               nels 1‑4 is performed at    . Notice that, if applying SCB,
                                                                                      3
                                                               the STA would have not been able to transmit until    . Al‑
                                                                                                           3
                                                               ternatively, regarding PU, any combination of free chan‑
                                                               nels could have been selected in    and    .
                                                                                                 3
                                                                                            2
                                                                          Ch 1
                                                                          Ch 2
                                                                          Ch 3
                                                                     STA
                                                                          Ch 4
                                                                                t 1        t 2   t 3

                                                                                       Channel busy
                                                                                       STA's transmission

                                                               Fig. 3 – Dynamic channel selection for transmitting when applying DCB.
          Fig. 2 – Dense WLAN deployment with multiple CB con igurations. Each
          number in the list of channels represents one basic 20 MHz channel.
                                                               Through the analysis conducted in [8], it was shown that
                                                               the right channel choice is not always trivial (i.e., selecting
          2.2  Policies for dynamic channel bonding
                                                               the widest channel does not necessarily entail achieving
          To harness the available spectrum within the CB opera‑   the highest performance).  First of all, using wider chan‑
          tion, Dynamic CB (DCB) mechanisms [7, 8] are applied to   nels entails spreading the same transmit power over the
          decide the set of channels for transmitting on a per‑packet   selected channel width,  which can potentially affect the
          basis, thus potentially improving performance. In [8], the   data rate used for the transmission, and therefore the ca‑
          following DCB policies were proposed and analyzed:   pabilities  of  the  receiver  on  decoding  data  successfully.
                                                               Moreover, the potential gains of DCB in crowded deploy‑
           • Static Channel Bonding (SCB): a transmitter is al‑   ments are hindered by the interactions between Wi‑Fi de‑
             lowed to use the entire set of channels only, thereby  vices,  which  may provoke  contention  or  collisions.  The
             limiting the election of any subset of channels. While
                                                               fact  is  that  WLAN  deployments  are  unplanned  and  op‑
             such a policy may optimize the performance in iso‑   erate under Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA). From
             lated deployments,  it lacks the necessary  lexibility  the perspective of a given transmitter‑receiver pair, such
             to deal with inter‑BSS interference.
                                                               a lack of coordination leads to uncontrolled interference
           • Always‑Max (AM): in this case, the widest combina‑   that can potentially degrade their performance.
             tion of channels is picked upon having sensed them
             free  during  the  back‑off  procedure.  While  such  a  Other DCB mechanisms were proposed in [10, 11, 12, 13],
                                                               which  include  collision‑detection,  carrier  sensing  adap‑
             policy seems to properly harness the available spec-
                                                               tation, or traf ic load awareness.  More recently, ML and
             trum, it has also been shown to generate starvation
                                                               game  theory  have  been  applied  to  address  CB  as  an
             and other issues as a result of inter-BSS interactions.
                                                               online    decision-making    problem    involving    multiple
         1 In the 5 GHz and 6 GHz bands, there are six and fourteen non‑  agents [14, 15].
          overlapping channels of 80 MHz, respectively.



                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2021                    69
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90