Page 17 - FIGI - Use of telecommunications data for digital financial inclusion
P. 17

4�4  Fraud prevention                              mandatory in the banking industry and, increasing-
            Analysis of location data from mobile telephones   ly, also for possession of SIM cards. KYC informa-
            indicate that ‘human trajectories show a high degree   tion generally requires a service provider to collect,
            of  temporal  and  spatial  regularity,  each  individual   verify and maintain basic identity information about
            being characterized by a time-independent charac-  customers, subject to audit by or sharing with the
            teristic travel distance and a significant probability to   relevant regulator. The information collected and
            return to a few highly frequented locations.’  Analysis   maintained generally includes verification of the
                                                  13
            of mobile phone data of 500,000 Orange customers   customer’s name, address, nationality, and an official
            in Cote d’Ivoire demonstrated that ‘human mobili-  government-issued  identification  number,  such  as
            ty is highly dependent on historical behaviours and   a passport number. Some jurisdictions also require
            that the maximum predictability is […] an approach-  biometric data such as a photograph or a copy of the
            able target for actual prediction accuracy.’  That   customer’s government-issued photo ID.
                                                    14
            ‘humans follow simple reproducible patterns’ offers   Many individuals and businesses that require
            potential to identify anomalous behaviour, and so   basic financial services do not have traditional bank
            detect potentially  fraudulent  financial transactions.   accounts  and  therefore  no  financial  institution  has
            Data indicating that a person is transacting from an   collected or verified their KYC information. Addi-
            unusual location may be made available to third party   tionally, banks have generally instituted KYC systems
            financial service providers, such as digital payment   appropriate to their bricks-and-mortar business
            service providers and credit card companies, which   model. Mobile operators, on the other hand, have
            they may use to block transactions until the individu-  collected  and  verified  KYC  information  on  a  much
            al’s identity is verified.                         broader segment of the population, including many
                                                               individuals using mobile money services that do not
            4�5  Identification and AML/CFT                    have traditional bank accounts. The mobile opera-
            Digital identity is another area where telecommu-  tors have also developed KYC processes consistent
            nications data has great potential to expand finan-  with their mobile, digital business models. These
            cial inclusion. Global efforts to fight terrorism and   MNO KYC processes include appropriate sharing of
            money laundering have driven “know your custom-    KYC data with regulators and other third parties such
            er”  (KYC)  obligations  in several  industries, but   as specialized KYC verification platforms and atten-
            these KYC obligations do not need to function in   tion to privacy, data protection and data localization
            industry silos. Internationally, KYC requirements are   requirements.



            5  MODELS FOR SHARING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS DATA

            Although MNOs do directly provide certain fintech     appears to be the earliest form of sharing for
            services, especially mobile money services, the real   DFS.
            value of telecommunications data for increased finan-  •   Under a data sharing proprietary product mod-
            cial inclusion requires a “partnership” between an    el, the MNO does not share any raw data or
            MNO and a financial services provider (FSP) where-    enter into a formal partnership with a financial
            by the telecommunications data is used to improve     institution. Instead, the MNO collects, processes
            delivery of the FSP’s financial services. The partner-  and packages subscriber data into credit scores
            ship between the MNO and FSP does not need to be      that can be sold to lenders and other financial
            a formal legal agreement or take a particular form,   services providers as a separate product. In this
            but there needs to be a mechanism for data held by    model, there is no sharing of raw data. The data
            the MNO or insights from it to be shared in some way   is shared in the form of the separate credit scor-
            with the FSP.                                         ing product.
               We  explore  here  two  broad  models  for  sharing
            telecommunications data for digital financial ser-
            vices:                                             5�1  Data sharing partnership model
                                                               The first model is a formal partnership where the
            •   Under a formal “partnership” model, an MNO     contractual documents forming the legal arrange-
                and a financial institution enter into a strategic   ments set out the terms and conditions for sharing of
                partnership and share data for that purpose. This   telecom data for fintech purposes. One of the earliest



                                                             Use of telecommunications data for digital financial inclusion  15
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22