Page 95 - ITU Journal, ICT Discoveries, Volume 3, No. 1, June 2020 Special issue: The future of video and immersive media
P. 95

ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, Vol. 3(1), June 2020



                                        THE VIDEO CODEC LANDSCAPE IN 2020
                               Michel Kerdranvat, Ya Chen, Rémi Jullian, Franck Galpin, Edouard François
                                               InterDigital R&D, Rennes, France


          Abstract – Video compression is a key technology for new immersive media experiences, as the percentage
          of video data in global Internet traffic (80% in 2019 according to the 2018 Cisco Visual Networking Index
          report) is steadily  increasing. The requirement  for higher video compression  efficiency is crucial in this
          context. For several years intense activity has been observed in standards organizations such as ITU-T VCEG
          and ISO/IEC MPEG developing Versatile Video Coding (VVC) and Essential Video Coding (EVC), but also in
          the ICT industry with AV1. This paper provides an analysis of the coding tools of VVC and EVC, stable since
          January 2020, and of AV1 stable since 2018. The quality and benefits of each solution are discussed from an
          analysis  of  their  respective  coding  tools,  measured  compression  efficiency,  complexity,  and  market
          deployment perspectives. This analysis places VVC ahead of its competitors. As a matter of fact, VVC has been
          designed by the largest community of video compression experts, that is JVET (Joint Video Experts Team
          between ITU-T and ISO/IEC). It has been built on the basis of High Efficiency Video Coding (H.265/HEVC)
          and Advanced Video Coding (H.264/AVC) also developed by joint teams, respectively JCT-VC and JVT, and
          issued in 2013 and 2003 respectively.
          Keywords – AV1, EVC, HEVC, Video Coding, VVC.

          1.   INTRODUCTION                                    unlike HEVC, some industry players are anticipating
                                                               the  publication  of  suitable  licensing  terms  for  a
          The landscape of video coding is evolving rapidly.   successful  deployment.  Besides  this  effort,  at  the
          New  solutions  are  developed  in  the  standards   initiative of a few companies, a parallel project for
          organizations  ISO/IEC  MPEG  (Motion  Picture       another video coding standard has been worked out
          Experts  Group)  and  ITU-T  VCEG  (Video  Coding    in MPEG with the same schedule. The name of this
          Experts Group), but also in the industry consortium   new coding standard is Essential Video Coding (EVC)
          Alliance  for  Open  Media  (AOM)  founded  in  2015.   [5], with the objective of being royalty-free for the
          Even  though  Advanced  Video  Coding  (AVC)  [1],   baseline  profile  and  royalty-bearing  for  the  main
          which  was  completed  in  2003,  is  the  dominant   profile  with  expected  timely  publication  of  the
          standard  nowadays  for  video  distribution,  new   licensing  terms.  The  landscape  is  completed  by
          services (such as UltraHD 4K format) are deploying   AOM which released the initial version of AV1 [6] in
          High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) [2] designed     2018.  AV1  was  developed  with  the  goal  of  being
          jointly by MPEG and VCEG, and issued in 2013. This   royalty-free,  and  hence  its  development  process
          move to HEVC is justified by a compression factor of   took into account not only technical factors, but also
          around  2  with  regards  to AVC  leading  to  half the   patent  rights  factors.  However,  licensing  terms  of
          transmission  or  storage  bit  rate  for  the  same   video coding standards have always been defined
          subjective  quality  [3].  To  face  the  emergence  of   by   patents   holders   once   their   technical
          increasing  picture  resolution  (e.g.,  UltraHD  8K   specifications have been released.
          format) and pixel definition (bit depth, color gamut,
          dynamic range), higher frame rates, and new uses     This  paper  presents  results  of  a  comparison
          (Video on mobile, Virtual Reality with 360° video...)   between the three solutions VVC, EVC and AV1 in
          impacting  production,  network  distribution,  and   terms  of  compression  efficiency,  complexity  and
          receivers  (TVs,  mobiles…),  MPEG  and  VCEG  have   features  relative  to  HEVC.  Careful  attention  was
          again  joined  their  resources  in  2015  to  start  an   paid to an as-fair-as-possible comparison between
          exploratory  phase,  resulting  in  2018  in  the    the  encoding  softwares,  considering  that  it  is  not
          launching of a joint team, Joint Video Experts Team   possible to get perfectly aligned comparisons, as the
          (JVET), tasked with designing a new video coding     encoder  algorithms  may  significantly  differ.  The
          standard, Versatile Video Coding (VVC), targeting a   first section presents an overview of the underlying
          50%    compression    gain   over   HEVC.   The      main coding tools from  respective standards. The
          specification  of  VVC  [4]  has  been  stable  since   following sections describe the test conditions and
          January  2020  and  completion  is  foreseen  for    associated  configuration  parameters  used  in  the
          July 2020.   As   with   previous   ITU-T   and      comparisons.
          ISO/IEC standards, VVC will be royalty-bearing, but



                                                © International Telecommunication Union, 2020                 73
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100