Page 105 - ITU Journal, Future and evolving technologies - Volume 1 (2020), Issue 1, Inaugural issue
P. 105

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 1 (2020), Issue 1




















                          (a)                                (b)                              (c)
                                                                                               ∘
                                                                                                               ∘
          Fig. 8 – Evaluation of the instantaneous data rate [Gbps] vs. the beam width and the vehicle speed, in case of (a)       = [0.1, 10] and (b)       = [30, 120] ,
          both by considering different speeds i.e.,    1 = 25,    2 = 50, and    3 = 75 [m/s]. (c) Instantaneous data rate [Gbps] vs. vehicle speed and distances, in
                           ∘
          case of       = [20, 70, 120] .

          Finally, in Fig. 8 (c) we analyze the impact of the speed      1          °
                                                                             RIM,   = 20
                                                                                b
          i.e., from 10 to 100 km/h, with respect to specific values of      RIM,   = 90  °
                                      ∘
          beam width i.e.,    = [20, 70, 120] . The behavior follows   0.8   no RIM b
                          
          the same trend as observed in Fig. 8 (a) and (b), where,
          as expected, for higher beam width the data rate perfor-     0.6
          mance is strongly reduced. Also, lower distances provide     Outage Probability
          higher performance.                                          0.4
                                                                       0.2
          5.2 Outage Probability
                                                                         0
          The outage probability is a crucial metric for vehicular       0     100   200   300   400   500
                                                                                     Distance [m]
          communication [24, 25], and can be defined as the instan-
          taneous mutual information rate that falls below a certain  Fig. 9 – Outage Probability vs. the distance, in case of (i) a meta-surface
                                                                                             ∘
                                                                                  ∘
          threshold   , i.e.:                                  with beam width       = 20 and       = 90 , and (ii) without a meta-
                                                               surface.
                           [       <   ] = 1 −      ,  (16)
                                                               meta-atoms needed in the metastructure for a high tun-
                                                               ing of the phase. In practice, the higher is the number of
          where                      is the success probability that SNR is  unit cells of the full structure, the better is the control of
          higher than   , and can be expressed as              the whole system, but also the control logic to drive the
                                                               controllable meta-surface is more sophisticated/compli-
                                              
                   =     [       >   ] =        (−                     ) , (17)  cated, since it is demanding a higher precision and could
                                                               make the system more vulnerable to misalignment errors.
          with          as the transmitting power.
          Based on the outage probability, given a specific target  6.  DISCUSSION
          rate as a Quality of Service (QoS) parameter, we can de-
                                                               In order to assess the performance of the system and to
          rive the throughput of success delivery with constrained
                                                               evaluate the potential impact of the RIM in a vehicular
          outage probability   , as [24]:
                                                               context, we have considered some assumptions to sim-
                        = (1 −   )         (1 +       ).  (18)  plify the analysis and give some useful insights for fu-
                                   2
                                                               ture work. Firstly, a perfect alignment between the relay
          In order to evaluate the impact of the presence of the  coatedwith the RIM and the receiverhasbeen considered.
          meta-surface, in Fig. 9, we consider a target rate of 1 Gbps  This assumption cannot be ensured above all in a con-
          and derive the corresponding outage probability as com-  text characterised with high speed. In order to account
          puted in Eq. (16). In order to better appreciate the ef-  for that, we need to introduce an error factor of the speed
          fect of the meta-surface, we consider two different beam  to account for the misalignment. A possible approach for
                    ∘
                           ∘
          widths of 20 and 90 . As expected, the lower is the beam  accounting the misalignment has been proposed in [26].
          width, the lower is the outage probability and the system  We believe that this misalignment could be translated as a
          has better performance in terms of capacity (see Fig. 10).  reduction of the received power and then in a decreasing
          The better performance is related to a higher precision of  of the SNR.
          the system, that corresponds to an increased number of  Another simplification introduced is the ideal configura-





                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2020                    85
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110