Page 29 - ITU Journal: Volume 2, No. 1 - Special issue - Propagation modelling for advanced future radio systems - Challenges for a congested radio spectrum
P. 29

ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, Vol. 2(1), December 2019



          4.4  Concurrent standard deviation at the two
               bands
          As described above the two converging links have
          an angular difference of about 17º and the distance
          between the points where the links cross a plane at
          1000  m  altitude  is  several  hundreds  of  meters.
          Nevertheless, a very high correlation between the
          scintillation  variance  at  the  two  frequencies  has
          been always observed. This means that the spatial
          stationarity of the turbulence is of the same order of
          the  distance  between  the  points  where  the  links
          cross the turbulence.
          Fig. 8 depicts the high correlation mentioned above,
          with the peculiarity that the Ka-band receiver has    Fig. 9 – Year scatter plot of the hourly averaged scintillation
          been  upgraded  during  this  month;  for  the  last             variance at the two frequencies
          10 days  of  the  month  a  higher         was  already   A  frequency  scaling  factor  for  the  variance  was
                                            0
          available. It is notorious that the presence of two   estimated, for example for the April data depicted in
          data sets being the lower set collected already with   Fig.  10,  by  performing  a  linear  fitting  to  the
          the better         estimated to be about 6.5 dB wrt to   variances  scatter  plot.  A  value  of  0.288  was
                        0
          the actual performance of the receiver (the receiver   obtained  for  the  slope  that  is  very  close  to  the
          NF had a fast CNR degradation during the last two    variance  scaling  factor  obtained  by  using  the
          months of operation).                                frequencies,   elevation   angles   and   antenna
                                                               reduction  factors  that  can  be  found  in  several
                                                               models.



















             Fig. 8 – May 2018 scatter plot of the hourly averaged
               scintillation variance at the two frequencies; CNR   Fig. 10 – A month scatter plot of the variance at the two bands
                        improvement is observed                             and a linear fitting to the data
          The annual scatter plot results presented in Fig. 9
          show  the  high  correlation  between  the  two      5.    SCINTILLATION MODELS
          variances  that  were,  nevertheless,  expected  from   A few essays of some available scintillation models
          the diurnal variation discussion in section 11. The   have been performed, such as, the scintillation fades
          obtained annual correlation was 0.772 and is quite   and  enhancements  using  the  Otung  [7],  ITU  [10]
          similar throughout all the months.                   (only  for  fades),  van  de  Kamp  [11]  and  the

                                                               Karasawa  [5]  models.  Fig.  11  and  Fig.  12  were
                                                               obtained for the Ka-band using the yearly average
                                                               measured             =51.5,  the  antenna  variance
                                                               averaging  factors  of  about  0.86  and  0.95
                                                               (respectively for the Ka and Q-band) computed for
                                                               a  turbulent  layer  height  of  1  km  (ITU  and  Otung
                                                               models) and 2 km (for the Karasawa model) and,




                                                © International Telecommunication Union, 2019                 13
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34