Page 212 - ITU KALEIDOSCOPE, ATLANTA 2019
P. 212
2019 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference
‘send’ the data to the servers of the company which owns European Commission, the Article 29 Working Party (now
the app and which then processes the data. What exactly the European Data Protection Board [16]) clarified the
happens technically behind the scenes is unclear. It is scope of the definition of data concerning health in relation
therefore unclear whether ‘sending’ data between the to lifestyle and wellbeing apps and provides criteria to
device and the server of a company can be seen as a determine when data processed by such apps and devices is
transfer within the meaning of the GDPR and whether the health data [17]. According to the Article 29 Working Party,
GDPR transfer regime applies to processing by modern personal data is health data when (1) the data is clearly
technologies. medical data, (2) the data is raw sensor data that can be
used in itself or in combination with other data to draw a
This research argues that the complexity of the GDPR legal conclusion about the actual health status or health risk of a
framework does not offer sufficient protection against person or (3) conclusions are drawn about a person’s health
processing by modern technologies. By taking a technical, status or health risk [18]. This means that, in general, data
behind the scenes perspective and looking at whether the is health data when it is used or can be used to draw
(technical) process of ‘sending’ data from a user’s device to conclusions about a person’s health. However, the Article
the server of a company can be seen as a transfer within the 29 Working Party also acknowledges that in some cases the
meaning of the GDPR, we argue that this process is a mere raw data itself is considered to be health data. It also
transit of data where the device functions only as a tool for acknowledges that presumably simple facts about
the companies to collect data [11]. In coming to this individuals, such as IQ, wearing glasses or lenses, smoking
conclusion, this article first needs to establish what the legal and drinking habits, membership of patient support groups,
basis for processing health data by modern technologies is. etc. are considered to be health data. In our view, the mere
We then look at the technical process used by modern fact that a person uses an app, for example to help quit
technologies and whether the GDPR transfer regime applies smoking or to count calories already says a lot about a
to this process in order to conclude whether the legal basis person. Whether or not true, the conclusion can be drawn
and the GDPR legal framework offer sufficient protection that the person is a smoker or may be obese and that he or
to processing by modern technologies. she may have health issues (such as lung or heart problems)
because of this. The mere fact that a person uses a health
2. LEGAL BASIS FOR PROCESSING HEALTH app already can say a lot about their health, and even more
DATA BY MODERN TECHNOLOGIES so when the data is combined with other health information
about a person. For example, an employer or insurer buying
The GDPR provides rules for the protection of personal health data and combining it with the information already
data and free movement of such data in order to protect the on record not only violates privacy but can also
fundamental rights and freedoms of persons. It applies to discriminate against their employee or the insured. This
the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in could lead to increases in insurance fees, rejection of
the EU, regardless of where the controller or processor are insurance and perhaps even in unemployment. Data
established [12]. This means that the GDPR applies to any generated by modern technologies which can conclude
company around the globe processing data of data subjects something about a person’s health in the broadest sense can
who are in the EU if the processing activities relate to therefore generally be seen as health data.
offering goods or services to data subjects or monitoring the
behavior of data subjects. As such, the GDPR aims at Health data has had a long history of being seen as a special
offering a similar level of protection for EU citizens category of data, also referred to as sensitive data, that
regardless of where the data is being processed [13]. This is requires additional protection. As such, Article 9 of the
particularly important when health data is being processed GDPR prohibits the processing of health data unless there is
by commercial companies who are not under any obligation a legal basis to do so. If there is no legal basis for
of professional secrecy. In previous research we have processing, the processing is considered to be unlawful.
established that many companies deny or at least do not According to the GDPR, explicit consent given by the data
mention the fact that they process health data while in fact subject is the legal basis for processing health data by
they are [14]. modern technologies [20, 21]. The GDPR thus allows
processing of personal health data by companies when a
While we use the more overarching term health data, data subject explicitly consents. Consent of the data subject
Article 4 (15) of the General Data Protection Regulation within the meaning of the GDPR means a clear affirmative
(GDPR) refers to it as ‘data concerning health’ and defines act establishing at least the freely given, informed
it as: indication that the data subject agrees to the processing of
his or her personal data [22]. Consent can also be given by
Personal data related to the physical or mental health of a electronic means, for example by ticking a box when
natural person, including the provision of healthcare visiting a website, choosing certain technical settings or any
services which reveal information about health status [15]. other statement or conduct which clearly indicates in this
context the data subject’s acceptance of the proposed
This is a very broad definition: any information which can processing. Pre-ticked boxes or inactivity by the data
reveal something about a person’s (mental) health is subject do not constitute consent [23]. The request for
considered to be health data. In the annex to its letter to the consent has to be clear, concise, not unnecessarily
– 192 –