Page 253 - Trust in ICT 2017
P. 253

Trust in ICT                                                5


            From the perspectives of standardization, trust should be quantitatively and/or qualitatively calculated and
            measured,  which  is  used  to  evaluate  values  of  physical  components,  value-chains  among  multiple
            stakeholders, and human behaviours including decision making. Trust is an important factor on the decision-
            making  process  not  only  used  by  humans  but  also  by  application  and  service  transactions  in  ICT
            environments. Therefore, trust has been highlighted to evaluate the functional capabilities of ICT resources,
            as well as the ICT services and applications.
            When a trustor and a trustee make trust relationships, both the trustor and the trustee have their own
            characteristics so-called trust propensity and trustworthiness, respectively [b-Mayer]. Trust propensity (i.e.,
            characteristic of the trustor) is a trait that leads to a generalized expectation about the trustworthiness of
            others. Trustworthiness (i.e., characteristic of the trustee) refers to a property that can be trusted and relied
            upon the trustee.
            In  general,  a  trustor  considers  three  main  sources  of  information  when  seeking  for  trust  as  own
            understanding about a trustee (as knowledge), personal expertise about the situation and the context (as
            experience), and public evidences on the trustee (as reputation). Knowledge can be characterized as direct
            trustworthiness attributes. It is measured from the primary data which are available to the trustor at first
            hand even before any meaningful communication would happened. On the other hand, experience and
            reputation information can be reflected as indirect trustworthiness attributes which are estimated basically
            from secondary data, often available after at least one interaction with each other.

            7.1.1   Direct trust
            Figure  2  shows  various  trustworthiness  attributes  that  are  categorized  into  three  major  factors:  ability,
            integrity, and benevolence [b-Mayer, b-Colquitt]. Many attributes can represent trustworthiness, which can
            be applied to ICT infrastructures and services.
            –       Ability (or capability): Ability means characteristics that enable an entity to have influence within
                    some specific contexts. The ability is specific because the trustee may be highly competent in some
                    technical area, affording that person is trusted on tasks related to that specific area. The attributes
                    related to ability include robustness, safety, stability, scalability, and reliability, etc.
            –       Integrity (or honesty): Integrity means the quality of being honest and fair in the social world or
                    means the state of being complete in cyber and physical worlds. In terms of information, integrity
                    means that information of an object is prevented from being modified; in other words, information
                    consistency by assuring that information will not be accidentally or maliciously altered or destroyed.
                    The  attributes  related  to  integrity  include  completeness,  consistency,  accuracy,  certainty,  and
                    recency, etc.
            –       Benevolence (or cooperation): Benevolence means the desire to do well to others, in other words,
                    working or acting together willingly for a common purpose  or benefit  when  trustor  has  an
                    interaction with trustee. Benevolence is also the extent to which a trustee is believed to do good to
                    the trustor, aside from an egocentric profit motive. The attributes related to benevolence include
                    availability, assurance, relevance, and credibility, etc.

            NOTE – Appendix II provides detailed information about trustworthiness attributes.






















                                                                                                         245
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258