Page 38 - FerMUN 2020 - Futurecasters Global Young Visionaries Summit, 8th-10th January 2020
P. 38

Countries or organizations involved in the debate:


               Apple, Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Google, India, Indonesia, Israël,
               Kenya,  Netherlands,  Russia,  Saudi  Arabia,  Singapore,  South  Africa,  South  Korea,  Sweden,
               Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA


               Countries of origin of the students:


               Costa  Rica,  France,  Greece,  Kenya,  Morocco,  New  Zealand,  Rwanda,  Switzerland,  Turkey,
               UAE, United Kingdom, USA






                                                      OUTCOME


               “Absolute freedom in decision-making processes vs introduction of

               international measures”


               The committee was made up of 44 delegates representing 22 delegations. They discussed two

               issues.
               The  first  issue  relates  to  the  various  changes  needed  to  integrate  young  people  into  the
               economy of tomorrow. The second issue involves reasoning on the impact of new technologies

               on the labour market, such as the progressive automation of industries, which makes some
               people fear the disappearance of jobs that do not require a high level of qualification.


               During the discussions, some delegations wished to retain absolute freedom in decision-making
               processes,  while  others  advocated  the  introduction  of  international  measures.  While  many
               delegations wished, at least in principle, to encourage negotiation and shared initiative, some

               measures were seen as threats to national sovereignty. The debates were very interesting in this
               respect, as compromise was necessary to achieve consensus.

               Furthermore, discussions also developed around the opposition between delegations wishing

               to limit the power of private companies over national economies, and those aiming to attract
               large  firms  to  their  countries,  and  thus  “feeding”  the  growing  influence  of  these  firms  over
               questions  of  labour  and  economic  policy.  This  meant  that  the  solutions  adopted  by  the

               committee in its resolutions had to take into account multiple perspectives, bringing together
               points of view that appeared diametrically opposed.




                                                                                                       37
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43