Page 57 - The Annual AI Governance Report 2025 Steering the Future of AI
P. 57

The Annual AI Governance Report 2025: Steering the Future of AI



                  1.4  Power Concentration


                  Another recurring theme was the concentration of power. A small number of corporations
                  and countries control the majority of compute infrastructure, talent, and datasets required
                  for frontier AI development. This concentration not only raises concerns about monopolistic
                  practices but also about accountability: decisions made in a handful of boardrooms could
                  shape the trajectory of AI globally. Governments often lack the power people attribute to them,
                  as powerful corporations increasingly influence politics, said Greece’s former Prime Minister
                  George Papandreou. Despite AI's potential to decentralize, it is currently leading to further
                  concentration of economic and wealth power in the hands of tech giants and oligarchs, who
                  often argue that regulation would stifle innovation.

                  Some panelists worried that without intervention, the benefits of AI will accrue to those already in
                  positions of power, while risks are externalized to the broader public. The imbalance of influence
                  could hinder competition, limit innovation in smaller markets, and entrench digital colonialism.

                  At the same time, some saw opportunities in shared infrastructure initiatives. Proposals such as
                  international compute facilities, collaborative research hubs, and open-source model registries
                  could democratize access. By reducing dependency on a small set of actors, such initiatives
                  could help balance the concentration of power with distributed innovation.




                      Quotes:

                      •    “[B]ig corporations, huge powers [are] influencing politics and that of course
                           puts governments in a very difficult situation. [Governments] do not really have
                           power that people think [they] do”. (George Papandreou, former Prime Minister
                           of Greece, General Rapporteur for Democracy, PACE, Council of Europe)
                      •    “Some of the unchecked risk taking by a few elites could actually lead to systemic
                           risk on a global level, including for the Global South and unprotected communities
                           worldwide.” (Brian Tse, CEO, Concordia AI)







                      Dive deeper in the Whitepaper “Themes and Trends in AI Governance”:
                      •    5.1 Global Compute Distribution





                  1.5  Complexity

                  AI presents not one, but  many interacting problems (alignment risk, adversarial abuse,
                  accidents, ecosystem issues like labor and over-reliance), making a single, comprehensive
                  governance framework difficult to create. Legal and governance solutions require the technical
                  ability to monitor AI capabilities, which is currently severely limited given the complexity and
                  continuous evolution of AI systems.

                  Reducing complex issues to vague terms like "trust" or "safety" is not seen as helpful. Terms like
                  robustness, fairness, privacy, and traceability each demand distinct technical methods and
                  oversight, said Anja Kaspersen (Director for Global Markets Development, Frontier Issues and




                                                           48
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62