Page 108 - AI Standards for Global Impact: From Governance to Action
P. 108

AI Standards for Global Impact: From Governance to Action



                  14�4  Standards, policies and regulations for sustainable AI and
                         environment


                  Regulatory frameworks and international standards can help guide the sustainable deployment
                  of AI in the energy and ICT sectors. It will also be important to consider data transparency,
                  institutional cooperation, and the alignment of national policies with global climate goals, as well
                  as clearly define the various stakeholders' roles in addressing the environmental impacts of AI.

                  Colombia’s data centre regulation project aims to improve the transparency and environmental
                  accountability of digital infrastructure as part of the country's effort to collect data on energy
                  consumption and GHG emissions. Recognizing the importance of political will private-sector
                  participation, a call was made for regional cooperation and harmonized standards, particularly
                  for reporting frameworks that could be adopted across Latin America.

                  Brazil offered a national perspective in the lead-up to COP30, which it will host. Brazil is
                  committed to environmental protection and climate diplomacy, given the centrality of sustainable
                  digital transformation and AI governance in shaping Brazil’s COP30 priorities. From Brazil's
                  perspective, there is a need to consider embedding AI energy regulation into the broader
                  UNFCCC agenda and multilateral institutions like ITU could help to scale support for capacity-
                  building in emerging economies.

                  The African Telecommunication Union (ATU) underlined the regulatory and infrastructural gaps
                  in Africa that challenge sustainable AI deployment and called for fit-for-purpose standards that
                  reflect the realities of developing and least developed countries, especially where digital access
                  is still limited. ATU noted that the ICT sector can play a dual role in accelerating access to energy
                  through smart grids and reducing its own footprint, but only if regulators are equipped with
                  the right tools and data.


                  Considering the work of France and the EU on digital environmental regulation, referencing the
                  European Data Act and energy performance monitoring of data centres, binding obligations
                  for AI developers and data centre operators, including disclosure of energy intensity, carbon
                  footprint, and water usage were deemed to be important. The discussion also noted the
                  importance of alignment between national regulators and global standard-setting bodies like
                  ITU, recalling the importance of data measurement at the international level.

                  Some key takeaways include:

                  a)   Data access remains a bottleneck. Several panellists echoed the need for greater
                       transparency on energy consumption and GHG emissions, with this data being essential
                       for developing effective regulations and standards.
                  b)   Considering the dual nature of AI as a tool for energy optimization as well as a source
                       of energy demand, regulators could consider systems-level regulatory approaches that
                       integrate AI policy with climate and digital infrastructure policy.
                  c)   Developing countries need support, and capacity building for policymakers and regulators
                       will be important, particularly in Africa and Latin America.
                  d)   Calls were made to accelerate the adoption of relevant standards from standards bodies
                       such as ITU.
                  e)   The session framed COP30 as a strategic moment to embed digital sustainability and AI
                       governance into global climate action.
                  f)   Opportunities for ITU-T Study Group 5






                                                           96
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113