Page 482 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024
P. 482

2024 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference




           is  particularly  advantageous  for  in-depth  research  in   4.6.4  Inter-Construct Relationships
           specialized fields like sustainable development.
                                                              H4a: There will be a significant negative correlation between
           4.5   Sample                                       "Community Awareness" and " Policy Effectiveness "
           The study aims to collect data from 500 respondents from   H4b: There will be a significant positive correlation between
           various rural communities. The Data Collection Instrument   " Environmental Barriers. " and " Policy Effectiveness."
           includes a structured questionnaire, consisting of Likert scale
           questions, ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly   4.7  Sampling Style
           Agree). Sampling method: opting for a Purposive Sampling
           strategy  with  a  relatively  large  sample  size  of  500   Purposive  Sampling:  Criteria  for  Selection:  In  alignment
           respondents  could  offer  a  more  robust  dataset  while  still   with  the  research  objectives  of  assessing  the  impact  of
           maintaining  the  targeted  focus  of  the  research.  The  large   environmental barriers on sustainable development, specific
           sample  size  would  lend  the  findings  greater  credibility,   criteria could be established for selecting respondents. For
           particularly  useful  for  specialized  research  fields  like   instance,  the  study  could  focus  on  community  leaders,
           Environmental Sustainability.                      environmental  activists,  educators,  and  ordinary  citizens
                                                              with a known commitment to sustainable practices.
           A  Confirmatory  Factor  Analysis  Approach  in  Rural
           Communities,"  the  hypotheses  would  aim  to  establish  the   Justification: This methodology is apt when the user seeks to
           validity  and  reliability  of  the  latent  constructs  being   study a particular subgroup within the larger community that
           measured. Specifically, the hypotheses would be concerned   has  specialized  knowledge  or  exposure  to  environmental
           with  testing  the  structural  relationships  between  observed   practices, policies, or challenges.
           variables  (questionnaire  items)  and  their  respective  latent
           variables  (constructs),  such  as  "Community  Awareness,"   Sample Size: A sample size of 500 would provide a more
           "Policy Effectiveness," and "Environmental Barriers." Given   extensive dataset, offering richer insights and allowing for
           the  user's  strong  emphasis  on  academic  rigor,  these   more  rigorous  statistical  analyses,  such  as  Confirmatory
           hypotheses would provide a systematic foundation for data   Factor Analysis, to validate the study's constructs.
           analysis and interpretation.
                                                              Sample Area: The sample area includes a small village of
           4.6   Hypotheses for Confirmatory Factor Analysis:   Noachar, Purba Burdwan District, West Bengal which is rich
                                                              in alluvial plains and a rich biodiversity.
           4.6.1  Community Awareness (CA)
                                                              4.7.1  Calculation of Sampling Error:
           H1a:  The  indicators  for  the  construct  of  "Community
           Awareness"  will  have  significant  and  positive  factor   It  should  be  noted  that  in  non-probability  methods  like
           loadings.                                          Purposive  Sampling,  the  concept  of  sampling  error  in  the
                                                              probabilistic sense does not apply directly, as the sample is
           H1b: The Cronbach's alpha for the "Community Awareness"   not random. However, for the purpose of academic rigor, one
           construct  will  exceed  0.7,  indicating  high  internal   can  still  compute  post-hoc  confidence  intervals  based  on
           consistency.                                       observed sample variability, with the caveat that these should
                                                              be interpreted cautiously.
           4.6.2  Policy Effectiveness (PE)
                                                              Descriptive Statistics: After collecting the data, the mean (μ)
           H2a:  The  indicators  for  the  construct  of  "Policy   and standard deviation (σ) for the attribute of interest (e.g.,
           Effectiveness"  will  have  significant  and  positive  factor   community  involvement  in  sustainable  practices)  can  be
           loadings.                                          calculated.

           H2b: The Cronbach's alpha  for the "Policy Effectiveness"   Confidence  Interval:  The  confidence  interval  around  the
           construct  will  exceed  0.7,  indicating  high  internal   sample mean can then be calculated as:
           consistency.
                                                              Confidence Interval= μ±(Z×σ/(√n))
           4.6.3  Environmental Barriers (EB)
                                                              Where:
           H3a:  The  indicators  for  the  construct  of  "Environmental
           Barriers" will have significant and positive factor loadings.   Z is the Z-value for a 95% confidence level (Z=1.96)
           H3b: The Cronbach's alpha for the "Environmental Barriers"   n is the sample size (500 for this example)
           construct  will  exceed  0.7,  indicating  high  internal
           consistency.                                       The computed confidence interval would provide an estimate
                                                              of the range in which the true population parameter is likely




                                                          – 438 –
   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487