Page 78 - ITUJournal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 1

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 1

to solve controller placement in any SDN‑enabled [5] Diego Kreutz, Fernando MV Ramos,
data‑plane (such as data‑planes that support protocols Paulo Esteves Verissimo,
such as P4 Runtime, a successor to OpenFlow). We Christian Esteve Rothenberg,
believe that our method and analysis would be bene icial Siamak Azodolmolky, and Steve Uhlig.
for operators and service providers, not only during the “Software‑de ined networking: A comprehensive
initial design, but also during the incremental design of survey”. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 103.1 (2015),
the SDN‑enabled networks. pp. 14–76.
[6] Slavica Tomovic, Milica Pejanovic‑Djurisic, and
10. FUTURE WORK Igor Radusinovic. “SDN based mobile networks:
Concepts and bene its”. In: Wireless Personal
In future we intend to extend our work to address
Communications 78.3 (2014), pp. 1629–1644.
dynamic controller placement which is necessary to
meet 5G requirements such as ultra‑reliable low latency [7] Enrique Hernandez‑Valencia, Steven Izzo, and Beth
communications achievable through dynamic placement Polonsky. “How will NFV/SDN transform service
of the mobile edge computing node. We also plan provider opex?” In: IEEE Network 29.3 (2015),
to evaluate the security aspect of SDN controllers. pp. 60–67.
This is motivated by the fact that centralizing the [8] Brandon Heller, Rob Sherwood, and
network control intelligence presents a single point of Nick McKeown. “The controller placement
attack/failure. problem”. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer
The assumption that the bandwidth for all connection Communication Review 42.4 (2012), pp. 473–478.
links is constant (see Section 4.1) is not valid for the actual [9] Maryam Tanha, Dawood Sajjadi, and Jianping Pan.
SANReN network. This assumption was made to simplify “Enduring node failures through resilient
the mathematical model formulation. In future, a more controller placement for software de ined
complicated scenario with different link bandwidths will networks”. In: Global Communications Conference
be considered. (GLOBECOM), 2016 IEEE. IEEE. 2016, pp. 1–7.
In this work, traf ic load was set to 512 bytes which does [10] Internet2 Network Infrastructure Topology. Last
not re lect the actual traf ic exchanges between SANReN accessed January 2018. URL: https : / / www .
nodes. As future work, a characterization of the actual internet2 . edu / media / medialibrary / 2018 /
traf ic pro iles combined with a rerun of the evaluation in 07/16/Internet2-Network-Infrastructure-
Section 7 will be considered. We also intend to use the Topology-All-legendtitle.pdf.
proposed approach to optimize data‑planes running P4 [11] Yan‑Nan Hu, Wen‑Dong Wang, Xiang‑Yang Gong,
Runtime protocol. Last but not least, we intend to develop Xi‑Rong Que, and Shi‑Duan Cheng. “On the
a dynamic control traf ic load balancing application based placement of controllers in software‑de ined
on current switch resource (RAM, CPU, and storage) networks”. In: The Journal of China Universities
utilization. of Posts and Telecommunications 19 (2012),
pp. 92–171.
REFERENCES [12] Rocketfuel. accessed March 2018. URL: https://

[1] Menzie D Chinn and Robert W Fairlie. “ICT use in github.com/CS236340/RocketFuel.
the developing world: an analysis of differences in [13] Yannan Hu, Wang Wendong, Xiangyang Gong,
computer and Internet penetration”. In: Review of Xirong Que, and Cheng Shiduan. “Reliability‑aware
International Economics 18.1 (2010), pp. 153–167. controller placement for software‑de ined
[2] Cisco. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and networks”.In:IntegratedNetworkManagement(IM
Methodology, 2016–2021. Tech. rep. 2017. 2013), 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium
on. IEEE. 2013, pp. 672–675.
[3] Marc Bourreau and Tommaso Valletti. “Enabling
digital inancial inclusion through improvements [14] Guang Yao, Jun Bi, Yuliang Li, and Luyi Guo.
in competition and interoperability: What works “On the capacitated controller placement
and what doesn’t”. In: CGD Policy Paper 65 (2015), problem in software de ined networks”. In:
pp. 1–30. IEEE Communications Letters 18.8 (2014),
pp. 1339–1342.
[4] Why SDN or NFV Now? Last accessed June 2018.
URL: https : / / www . sdxcentral . com / sdn / [15] Yury Jimenez, Cristina Cervello‑Pastor, and
definitions / why - sdn - software - defined - Aurelio J Garcia. “On the controller placement
for designing a distributed SDN control layer”.
networking - or - nfv - network - functions -
In: Networking Conference, 2014 IFIP. IEEE. 2014,
virtualization-now/.
pp. 1–9.

62 © International Telecommunication Union, 2021