Page 55 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2020

integrate it into the STEP model according to the EXPRESS Disclaimer
schema. The results of the paper include:
No approval or endorsement of any commercial product by
 A general approach has been developed for how NIST is intended or implied. Certain commercial software
kinematic and geometrical data can be extracted to systems are identified in this paper to facilitate
a neutral format. The general approach is meant to understanding. Such identification does not imply that these
be applicable to all CAx tools. software systems are necessarily the best available for the
 Explaining how the general approach was used for purpose.
a case specific setting, including a description of the
interfaces and software that were used. This is REFERENCES
specific for the tools selected and interfaces
determined for the case study. [1] NIST, “Product Definitions for Smart
 The translation of a machine model to the STEP Manufacturing,” www.nist.gov.
standard format was explained for a real machine https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/product-
model developed in the CAD software, PTC Creo. definitions-smart-manufacturing (accessed July 7,
 The case study with the PTC Creo machine model 2020).
serves as a feasibility study and demonstrates step-
by-step how this can be done. [2] S.S. Shipp, N. Gupta, B. Lal, J.A. Scott, C.L. Weber,
M.S. Finnin, M. Blake, S. Newsome, and S.
The work has real industrial impact and the standards-based Thomas, “Emerging global trends in advanced
digital representations of a complete machine tool model manufacturing,” Institute for Defense Analyses,
enables better information reuse, better interoperability, and Alexandria VA, March 2012.
more consistent management. It will help support decision
making throughout the different phases of a production [3] J. Davis, T. Edgar, J. Porter, J. Bernaden, and M.
system including machine tool procurement, efficient Sarli, “Smart manufacturing, manufacturing
machining capability definition and analysis, dynamic intelligence and demand-dynamic performance,”
planning and scheduling by facilitating last-minute Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol 47, pp.145-
adjustments to adapt current conditions, and configuration 56, 2012.
validation. Furthermore, it will save both time and money for
the manufacturing companies. [4] SMLC, “Implementing 21st century smart
manufacturing,” In Workshop summary report
This is a preliminary study. More real-world industrial cases SMLC, June 2011.
will be implemented. Also, more CAx software specific
adapters need to be developed. One scenario could be a real- [5] Y. Lu, K.C. Morris, and S. Frechette, “Current
world study with supply chains involving several companies standards landscape for smart manufacturing
using different systems and those companies representing systems,” National Institute of Standards and
both large enterprises and small and medium-sized Technology, NISTIR 8107, 2016.
enterprises. Supply chains in both process and discrete
manufacturing may be used to demonstrate how existing [6] P. Vichare, X. Zhang, V. Dhokia, W.M. Cheung,
challenges in information sharing and model exchange could W. Xiao, and L. Zheng, “Computer numerical
be addressed. control machine tool information reusability within
virtual machining systems,” Proceedings of the
Acknowledgements Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal
of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 232 no. 4, pp. 593-
The work presented in this paper has been supported by the 604, 2018.
NIST Model-Based Enterprise (MBE) program and Area of
Advance Production at Chalmers University of Technology [7] P. Vichare, A. Nassehi, and S. Newman, “A unified
as well as the research projects Digitala Stambanan and 4S manufacturing resource model for representation of
that are funded by the Swedish Agency for Innovation computerized numerically controlled machine
Systems (VINNOVA). tools,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering
The authors also would like to thank Dr. Parag Vichare from Manufacture, vol. 223 no.5, pp. 463-83, 2009.
University of the West of Scotland for providing the machine
model, Steven Mallia from Purdue University and Yujiang [8] T. Kjellberg, A. von Euler-Chelpin, M. Hedlind, M.
Li from Siemens for their support, and colleagues from ISO Lundgren, G. Sivard, and D. Chen D, “The machine
TC 184 SC4 WG 15 Digital Manufacturing Implementation tool model – A core part of the digital factory,”
Forum for valuable discussions and support. CIRP Annals, vol. 58 no. 1, pp. 425-428, 2009.

– li –