Page 71 - FIGI: Security Aspects of Distributed Ledger Technologies
P. 71

183   See https:// www .augur .net/ . A ‘prediction market protocol’ which enables reporting of external events by blockchain
                participants and uses a validation-dispute protocol to help ascertain veracity.
            184   See https:// www .augur .net. See also the Augur white paper. Peterson, J; Krug, J; Zoltu, M et al. (2018) Augur: a
                Decentralized Oracle and Prediction Market Platform, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2XPzH6C
            185   ‘ChainLink is blockchain middleware that allows smart contracts to access key off-chain resources like data feeds,
                various web APIs, and traditional bank account payments…. The LINK Network is the first decentralized oracle network;
                allowing anyone to securely provide smart contracts with access to key external data, off-chain payments and any
                other API capabilities. Anyone who has a data feed, useful off-chain service such as local payments, or any other API,
                can now provide them directly to smart contracts in exchange for LINK tokens.’ See http:// bit .ly/ 2JO4CGx and http://
                bit .ly/ 2So0zEu
            186   ‘The Town Crier (TC) system addresses this problem by using trusted hardware , namely the Intel SGX instruction
                set, a new capability in certain Intel CPUs. TC obtains data from target websites specified in queries from application
                contracts. TC uses SGX to achieve what we call its authenticity property. Assuming that you trust SGX, data delivered
                by TC from a website to an application contract is guaranteed to be free from tampering.’ Town Crier (2019) What is
                Town Crier?, available at http:// bit .ly/ 30ALRgg

            187   https:// aeternity .com/
            188   Derksen (2019) An Introduction to Aeternity’s State Channels, available at http:// bit .ly/ 30F4vDW
            189   Aeternity (2018) Blockchain Oracles, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2NYOc3g
            190   https:// rlay .com
            191   Rlay (2018) Rlay: A Decentralized Information Network, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2M5KLVM; Hirn, M (2018) Introducing
                Rlay, a Decentralized Protocol for Blockchain’s External Data Problem, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2JQQ2xI
            192   https:// gnosis .pm; See also Gnosis (2017) Gnosis Whitepaper, available at http:// bit .ly/ 32CdQxU
            193   http:// bit .ly/ 30Lf4W9
            194   Includes partition & delay, Tampering, and BGP Hijacking.
            195   Apostolaki, M; Zohar, A & Vanbever, L (2018) Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on Crypto-currencies, available at
                http:// bit .ly/ 2JNzjLN; Stewart, J (2014) BGP Hijacking for Cryptocurrency Profit, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2LYd8Fn
            196   Stewart, J (2014) BGP Hijacking for Cryptocurrency Profit, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2LYd8Fn
            197   Apostolaki, M; Zohar, A & Vanbever, L (2018) Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on Crypto-currencies, available at
                http:// bit .ly/ 2JNzjLN; Stewart, J (2014) BGP Hijacking for Cryptocurrency Profit, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2LYd8Fn
            198   http:// www .manrs .org/
            199   Bissias, G; Ozisik, A; Levine, B et al. (2014), Sybil Resistant Mixing for Bitcoin, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2xSQu9h
            200   Garner, B (2018) What’s a Sybil Attack & How Do Blockchains Mitigate Them?, available at http:// bit .ly/ 2LvO09I
            201   An attacker gains control over a sufficient number of IP addresses to monopolize all incoming and outgoing
                connections and to the target.
            202   Heilman, E; Kendler, A; Zohar, A et al. (2015), Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin’s Peer-to-Peer Network, available at http:// bit
                .ly/ 2O2QU89
            203   ibid
            204   ibid
            205   Unlike physical currency which immediately changes possession to a receiving party and can be instantly confirmed
                on sight, digital currency can be submitted multiple times and requires confirmation of the sender’s possession of the
                digital currency – which may not be instantaneous – to finalize a transaction.
            206   Transaction times vary, with Bitcoin averaging 8-10 minutes and Ethereum 15 seconds to add a new block. However,
                confirmation times for transactions typically require the addition of several new blocks before finality can be
                considered low risk.
            207   Johnson, K (2017) Ripple & the Gates Foundation Team Up to Level the Economic Playing Field for the Poor, available at
                http:// bit .ly/ 32uG1ix
            208   Culubas (2011) Timejacking & Bitcoin, available at http:// bit .ly/ 30G4DmI







                                                                   Security Aspects of Distributed Ledger Technologies  69
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76