Page 204 - ITU KALEIDOSCOPE, ATLANTA 2019
P. 204

2019 ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference




           designed to promote EHRs’ successful development and   added to the Internet due to the growing popularity
           sustainability across the globe. This paper revisits the issue  of EHRs, medical genetic sequencing and wearable
           of healthcare management to describe the design of a credible  medical devices.  Therefore, the protection of user
           blockchain-based e-health records (CB-EHRs) platform and  privacy and medical information security becomes more
           its performance evaluation.  The proposed platform can  urgent and important.
           be used to secure transactions through anonymity and
           traceability of health data in cyber-healthcare systems, such  2.2  Blockchain-based EHRs related research
           as those proposed in [6–10].
           The rest of the paper is structured as follows: section 2  In order to address the aforementioned problems, many
           presents related study on blockchain and a summary of  researchers have proposed relevant solutions through strategy
           challenges in the EHRs platform, highlighting the gaps and  research, architectural frameworks and model designs [16–
           opportunities that have been identified in the current system.  18].  For example, in 2011 Sebastian Haas [16] et
           The key contribution of this paper is described in sections 3  al.  proposed a privacy protection system based on data
           and 4, detailing the components and related functions of the  services and patient service models. Yarmand et al. [17]
           proposed CB-EHRs. Section 5 details the performance of  in 2013 proposed a behavior-based access control for a
           the choice consensus algorithm. Finally, section 6 concludes  distributed healthcare model to solve the user’s privacy
           the paper and presents a possible extension to the CB-EHRs  problem.  Recently, with the development of blockchain
           platform.                                          technology, blockchain has not only been used in the
                                                              financial industry, but has also been adopted as a protective
            2.  BLOCKCHAIN-BASED RELATED WORK AND             mechanism in the medical domain. In 2016, Drew lvan [18]
                   CHALLENGES OF EHRS PLATFORM                proposed a blockchain approach to securely store patient
                                                              medical records. While the above-mentioned models used
           This section presents an expository detail on blockchain,  blockchain technology to facilitate data sharing and privacy
           the challenges of EHRs,   and related research on  protection, the framework it adopted presents a large amount
           blockchain-based EHRs.   The section concludes by  of network resource wastage or consumption.  For users
           highlighting the contribution of CB-EHRs platform proposed  who need treatment, functionalities of these models are not
           in this paper.                                     complete and need to be improved. Hence, this research
                                                              presents a credible blockchain-based electronic health records
           2.1 Challenges of EHRs platform                    (CB-EHRs) management platform, which is characterized by
                                                              decentralization, data tamper-proof, collective maintenance
           The EHRs platform is widely recognized as an enabling  mechanisms, security and credibility. This platform cannot
           platform, which promotes telemedicine in the current  only realize the capabilities of medical data sharing, but also
           technology age [11]. However, despite its wide acceptance  ensures the privacy of users.
           and use, there are some challenges that remain pertinent to
           the platform. Some of the known key challenges are:
                                                                      3.  BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY
             • Difficulty in medical data sharing: In order to advance
               medical research and facilitate patients, researchers  3.1 The concept of blockchain
               are committed to the sharing of medical data.  At
               present, there are some trust issues among medical  There are two basic definitions of blockchain [19, 20].
               institutions around the world. Hence, the verification,  In a narrow sense, blockchain is a non-tampered and
               synchronization and storage of medical data are  unforgeable distributed ledger that uses cryptographic
               hindered. When medical institutions and patients share  correlation algorithms. It is a chained data structure that
               data, they need to spend a lot of time and resources  links data blocks together in time order [19].  Broadly
               on identity and data validation. This makes medical  speaking, blockchain technology refers to a new distributed
               data acquisition very difficult [12].  Moreover, data  infrastructure and computing paradigm which is built on
               transmission is not secure and data can be tampered with.  a peer-to-peer network.  It uses a chained data structure
               All of these challenges seriously hinder the development  to validate and store data, a distributed node consensus
               of medical big data and electronic healthcare systems.  algorithm to generate and update data, and a cryptography
                                                              mechanism to protect data transmission and access security
             • Information security and privacy protection concerns:  [20]. Alliance chain (adopted in this paper): In an alliance
               Firstly, there is no complete scheme of medical privacy  blockchain, the consensus process is controlled by preselected
               protection in the electronic medical industry [13].  nodes. Only alliance members have permissions to read and
               Secondly, big data mining technology has potential  write the blockchain [21]. This type of blockchain can be
               risks of linkage attacks, which attempt to re-identify  seen as "partially decentralized".
               individuals in an anonymized data set by merging
               information from two or more datasets. Thirdly, the  3.2 PKI and digital signature
               user does not fully participate in the access control
               policy of the electronic health record [14,15]. However,  The  comprehensive  technology  required  to  provide
               more and more personal health information is now being  public-key encryption and digital signature services is known




                                                          – 184 –
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209