Page 113 - ITU Journal - ICT Discoveries - Volume 1, No. 2, December 2018 - Second special issue on Data for Good
P. 113

ITU JOURNAL: ICT Discoveries, Vol. 1(2), December 2018



          [  1  6  ]     N  i  s  s  e  n  b  a  u  m     H  .     P  r  i  v  a  c  y     i  n     C  o  n  t  e  x  t  :     [26]  Prainsack   B,   Buyx   A.   Solidarity   In
               Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social       Contemporary  Bioethics—Towards  A  New
               Life. Stanford, California: Stanford University       Approach. Bioethics 2012;26:343–50.
               Press; 2009.
                                                               [27]  Vayena E, Tasioulas J. “We the Scientists”: a
          [17]  Floridi L, editor. The Onlife Manifesto: Being       Human  Right  to  Citizen  Science.  Philos
               Human  in  a  Hyperconnected  Era.  Springer          Technol                   2015;28:479–85.
               Open; 2015.                                           doi:10.1007/s13347-015-0204-0.

          [18]  Yang  Y,  Fasching  PA,  Tresp  V.  Predictive   [28]  Mittelstadt  BD,  Floridi  L.  The  Ethics  of  Big
               Modeling of Therapy Decisions in Metastatic           Data:  Current  and  Foreseeable  Issues  in
               Breast  Cancer  with  Recurrent  Neural               Biomedical   Contexts.   Sci   Eng   Ethics
               N  e  t  w  o  r  k     E  n  c  o  d  e  r     a  n  d     M  u  l  t  i  n  o  m  i  a  l     2016;22:303–41.
               Hierarchical Regression Decoder. 2017 IEEE
               International  Conference  on  Healthcare       [29]  Braun     M,    Dabrock      P.   Ethische
               Informatics (ICHI), 2017, p. 46–55.                   Herausforderungen  einer  sogenannten  Big-
                                                                     Data  basierten  Medizin.  Zeitschrift  Für
          [19]  Institute   of   Medicine.   The   Learning          Medizinische Ethik 2016;4/2016.
               Healthcare  System:  Workshop  Summary.
               Washington,  D.C.:  The  National  Academic     [30]  Mittelstadt  B,  Benzler  J,  Engelmann  L,
               Press; 2007.                                          Prainsack  B,  Vayena  E.  Is  there  a  duty  to
                                                                     participate  in  digital  epidemiology?  Life  Sci
          [20]  Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P,          Soc Policy 2018;14:9.
               Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An Ethics Framework
               for  a  Learning Health Care System: A          [31]  Cargill SS. Biobanking and the Abandonment
               Departure  from  Traditional  Research  Ethics        of Informed Consent: An Ethical Imperative.
               and  Clinical  Ethics.  Hastings  Center  Report      Public Health Ethics 2016;9:255–63.
               2013;43:16–27.
                                                               [32]  Budin-Ljøsne  I,  Teare  HJA,  Kaye  J,  Beck  S,
          [21]  Bialobrzeski   A,   Ried   J,   Dabrock   P.         Bentzen  HB,  Caenazzo  L,  et  al.  Dynamic
               Differentiating and Evaluating Common Good            Consent: a potential solution to some of the
               a  n  d     P  u  b  l  i  c     G  o  o  d  :     M  a  k  i  n  g     I  m  p  l  i  c  i  t     challenges  of  modern  biomedical  research.
               Assumptions  Explicit  in  the  Contexts  of          BMC Med Ethics 2017;18:4.
               Consent  and  Duty  to  Participate.  PHG
               2012;15:285–92. doi:10.1159/000336861.          [33]  Vayena E, Blasimme A. Biomedical Big Data:
                                                                     New Models of Control Over Access, Use and
          [22]  Bedorf  T.  Gabe,  Recht  und  Ethik  in  Hénaffs    Governance. J Bioeth Inq 2017;14:501–13.
               anthropologischer      Genealogie      der
               Anerkennung. Westend 2010;7:123–32.             [34]  Montgomery J. Data Sharing and the Idea of
                                                                     Ownership. The New Bioethics 2017;23:81–6.
          [23]  Hénaff M. The Price of Truth: Gift, Money, and
               Philosophy.  Stanford,  California:  Stanford   [35]  Thouvenin  F,  Weber  RH,  Früh  A.  Data
               University Press; 2010.                               ownership:  Taking  stock  and  mapping  the
                                                                     issues.  In:  Dehmer  M,  Emmert-Streib  F,
          [24]  Hénaff  M.  Ceremonial  Gift-Giving:  The            editors. Frontiers in Data Science, Boca Raton:
               Lessons  of  Anthropology  from  Mauss  and           CRC Press; 2017, p. 111–45.
               Beyond.  In:  Satlow  ML,  editor.  The  Gift  in
               Antiquity, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013,   [36]  Fezer  K-H.  Repräsentatives  Dateneigentum.
               p. 12–24.                                             Ein zivilgesellschaftliches Bürgerrecht. Sankt
                                                                     Augustin & Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung;
          [25]  Haeusermann  T,  Greshake  B,  Blasimme  A,          2018.
               Irdam D, Richards M, Vayena E. Open sharing
               of genomic data: Who does it and why? PLOS      [37]  Gray  J,  Gerlitz  C,  Bounegru  L.  Data
               ONE 2017;12:e0177158.                                 infrastructure  literacy.  Big  Data  &  Society
                                                                     2018;5:2053951718786316.




                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2018                    91
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118