Page 77 - Proceedings of the 2017 ITU Kaleidoscope

Challenges for a data-driven society

of these implementations will have a positive impact in the [9] B. Goertzel, T. Goertzel, Z. Goertzel, “The global brain and
adoption and uptake of the standard. the emerging economy of abundance: Mutualism, open
collaboration, exchange networks and the automated
--Performance monitoring: the addition of uses cases and commons 2017”, Technological Forecasting and Social
examples will allow identifying what data is required to Change, vol. 114, pp. 65-73
inform the different recommendations given by the standard
and document the guidance offered. This will help users to [10] W.F. Lloyd,“Two lectures on the checks to population”,
objectively monitor their performance when implementing Oxford University, England, 1833, Retrieved on 2017-04-13:
the standard in projects and solutions https://archive.org/details/twolecturesonch00lloygoog

--“Executable standards”: blockchained standards are [11] J. Rifkin, “The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of
programmed standards that can be installed in any computer Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of
and users, by imputing the required data against the Capitalism”, Kindle Edition, 2014
executable standard, will get a self-assessment on the [12] J. Yakowitz “Tragedy of the Data Commons”, Harvard
compliance and conformity of their projects, solutions, or Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 25 (1), pp. 1-67
products with that given standard.
[13] T. Simonite, “Betting on the Blockchain”, Technology
ACKNOLWEDGMENTS Review, vol. 120 no. 1, pp. 29-30, 2017

This work was partially supported by the Spanish [14] E. Davidson, “Hive mentality or blockchain bloat?”, New
Government through the project TEC2016-79510-P. Scientist, vol 228 no. 3043, pp. 52, 2015

REFERENCES [15] M. Swan, “Blockchain Thinking: The Brain as a
Decentralized Autonomous Corporation”, IEEE Technology
and Society Magazine, vol. 34 no. 4, pp. 41-52, 2015
[1] UNEP (2016) Fintech and Sustainable Development-
Assessing the Implications, Inquiry: Design of a Financial [16] H. Koop, C. Boesch, F. Kargl, “KopperCoin - A Distributed
System. UNEP. Retrieved in August 2017 from: File Storage with Financial Incentives”, 12th International
http://unepinquiry.org/wp- Conference on Information Security Practice and Experience
content/uploads/2016/12/Fintech_and_Sustainable_Develop (ISPEC), Zhangjiajie, Peoples Republic of China, Lecture
ment_Assessing_the_Implications_Summary.pdf Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10060, pp. 79-93, 16-18
Nov. 2016
[2] X. Xu, C. Patausso, L. Zhu, V. Gramoli, A. Ponomarev, S.
th
Chen, “The Blockchain as a Software Connector”, 13 [17] R. Dumitru, S. Gatti, « Towards a Reference Architecture for
Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Trusted Data Marketplaces similar to The Credit Scoring
(WICSA), Venice, Italy, Proceedings, pp. 182-191, 5-8 April Perspective”, 2nd International Conference on Open and Big
2016
Data (OBD), Vienna, Austria, Proceedings, pp. 95-101, 22-
24 Aug., 2016
[3] L. Liebman, “Reduced ownership costs key to
competitiveness - BGE uses IT Ledger to gain control of
distributed assets”, Communication news, vol. 36 no. 1, pp. [18] L.M. Marsal, “The Intelligenter method (III) for "smarter"
standards development and standardisation instruments”,
14-15, 1999
Computer, Standards and Interfaces, vol 50, pp. 142–152,
2017
[4] K. Ohmori, “An Internet accounting system”, 5th
International Conference on Computational Intelligence and
Multimedia Applications, Chian, Peoples Republic of China. [19] D. Maxwell, C. Speed, L. Pschetz, “Story Blocks:
the
blockchain”,
Reimagining
through
narrative
Proceedings, pp278-283, 27-30 Sept., 2003
Convergence-The International Journal of Research into new
media technologies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 79-97, 2017
[5] D. Tapscott, A. Tapscott, “How Blockchain Will Change
Organizations”, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 58 no. [20] T. Redshaw, « Bitcoin beyond ambivalence: Popular
2, pp. 10, 2017
rationalization and Feenberg's technical politics”, Thesis
Eleven, vol. 138 no. 1, pp46-64, 2017
[6] M. Swan, “Blockchain Temporality: Smart Contract Time
Specifiability with Blocktime”, 10th Annual International
Web Rule Symposium (RuleML) Stony Brook, NY, Lecture [21] L.M. Marsal, “The Standards Evolution: A pioneering Meta-
Standard Framework Architecture as a novel self-conformity
Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9718, pp. 184-196, 06-09
July, 2016 assessment and learning tool”. Computer, Standards and
Interfaces, -in press-, 2017
[7] L.D. Ibáñez, E. Simperl, F. Gandont, et al., “Redecentralizing [22] V.L Lemieux, “Trusting records: is Blockchain technology
the Web with Distributed Ledgers”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, the answer?”, Records Management Journal, vol. 26 no. 2,
32(1), pp. 92-95, 2017 pp. 110-139, 2016

[8] M. Ianisti, K.R. Lakhani, “The truth about Blockchain”,
Harvard Business Review, vol. 95 no. 1, pp. 119-127, 2017

– 61 –