Page 61 - Proceedings of the 2017 ITU Kaleidoscope
P. 61
Challenges for a data-driven society
likely from ETSI members who have signed the CLA. can utilize OSS, the strict exclusion of OSS code in
Reflecting on our analysis in section 3.2, if patents turn out specifications might also impede full utilization of OSS.
to be essential, without clear guidance, Apache v.2, which The power of code is likely to go up, since there are already
directly governs the OSM, FRAND will prevail and such questions of whether the industry can rely only on open
patent right will be made royalty free to any recipient that source to define functions of future technologies instead of
agrees to Apache v.2 in OSM. formulating a standard [36]. Nevertheless, there is no need
Besides the possibility of rendering members’ patents to RF, for SSOs to panic, as Updegrove said, “code [actually] has
the “patent retaliation” brings more concerns. As we been creeping into standards for years, [but] often without
learned, contributors have to agree not to file patent the keepers of intellectual property rights policies
litigation against the “Work” to avoid triggering patent governing the standards even being aware of it” [37]. What
retaliation. However, as the project continues, the “Work” matters is for SSOs to realize the issue, conceive its own
will grow much larger than it was when first contributed goal, and design an optimum mode accordingly.
and when the CLA was created. The current ToR did not
provide any mechanism to monitor the continuing REFERENCES
contributions to the project, which may cause uneasiness
when companies decide to participate. Perhaps such [1] J. Erfanian et al., “Network Functions Virtualisation –
uncertainty can explain the number of participants in OSM White Paper on NFV priorities for 5G Network Functions
at the time of this writing, with 65 companies having signed [2] Virtualisation (NFV),” Bilbao, Spain, 2017.
B. Lundell and J. Gamalielsson, “On the potential for
on to the project, 32 of which are ETSI members. improved standardisation through use of open source
Considering that the ETSI has over 800 members, the work practices in different standardisation organisations:
current participating number is by no means high. How can open source-projects contribute to development
of IT-standards?,” in EURAS Proceedings, 2017, pp.
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 137–155.
As we summarized in Part 3, the current legal frameworks [3] ETSI, “Open Source impacts on ICT standardization,”
2005.
on IPRs licensing of SSOs, including the ITU, IEEE and [4] J. P. Kesan, “The Fallacy of OSS Discrimination by
ETSI, have shown gaps for OSS to fit in. By exploring the FRAND Licensing : An Empirical Analysis,” no. 10,
ETSI OSM case, we further enriched our arguments. 2011.
First and foremost, although consortia, such as W3C and [5] I. G. Mitchell QC and S. Mason, “Compatibility Of The
OASIS, started similar processes, it was conducted mostly Licensing Of Embedded Patents With Open Source
in industries where patents were less heavy. For instance, an Licensing Terms,” Int. Free Open Source Softw. Law
Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–58, 2011.
empirical research about OASIS showed that technical committees on
telecommunication sectors were among the two that opted for royalty [6] B. Lundell, J. Gamalielsson, and A. Katz, “On
bearing FRAND commitment other than RF commitment [30] Implementation of Open Standards in Software: To What
Considering that more than 100,000 SEPs have been Extent Can ISO Standards be Implemented in Open
declared in the ETSI under FRAND commitments [35], Source Software?,” Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res., vol. 13,
OSM is a pioneering step that other formal SSOs can learn no. 1, pp. 47–73, 2016.
from. [7] ITU, “Joint ITU-NGMN Alliance Workshop ‘Open
Source and Standards for 5G,’” 2016. [Online]. Available:
Secondly, the ToR presents the ETSI’s awareness to http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/Workshops-and-
address some of the tensions we described in Part 3. It Seminars/itu-ngmn/Pages/default.aspx. [Accessed: 27-
clarifies the goal of hosting the OSM, which leads to a Sep-2017].
clearer scope of application of ETSI IPRs policy (e.g. [8] ANSI, “Open Source, Open Standards, Open Minds:
FRAND commitment and the software guidelines), thus ANSI Announces Free Event on April 15 in Washington,
removing some tensions such as in the direct use of cunning DC,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
https://www.ansi.org/news_publications/news_story?men
code. This in turn confirms our hypothesis on potential uid=7&articleid=2da23a16-f02e-40cc-81bf-
tensions if we only rely on the existing framework. 7bd0cfdd0bfb. [Accessed: 27-Sep-2017].
Secondly, we found out that ETSI members might still have [9] “ETSI - Workshop on Open source and standardization:
a reason for concern as the project develops. Without a legal interactions,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
clear guidance on the priority of FRAND and Apache v.2, http://www.etsi.org/news-events/events/1114-workshop-
there is a chance for making patents embedded in standards on-open-source-and-standardization-legal-interactions.
free from royalty charges to a “Work” that is too large to be [Accessed: 31-Mar-2017].
controlled. One goal of the ETSI is “seeking a balance [10] “OSM.” [Online]. Available: https://osm.etsi.org/.
[Accessed: 18-Apr-2017].
between the needs of standardization for public use … and [11] OSI, “Open Source Licenses by Category.” [Online].
the right of the owners of IPRs” [16], which may need Available: https://opensource.org/licenses/category.
further consideration. Besides, other open source projects, [Accessed: 27-Sep-2017].
e.g., OOCRAN under AGPL (as of this writing) may also [12] K. Krechmer, “Cathedrals, Libraries and Bazaars.”
contribute implementations to ETSI MANO. Such Association of Computing Machinery (ACM)
ambiguity is by no means an ideal circumstance. Symposium on Applied Computing SAC, Marid, 2002.
Further, although the ETSI sets an example of how SSOs [13] ITU, “Understanding patents, competition &
standardization in an interconnected world,” 2014.
[14] E. Raymond, “The cathedral and the bazaar,” First
Monday, vol. 2, no. SPEC, pp. 1–40, 2005.
– 45 –