Page 61 - Proceedings of the 2017 ITU Kaleidoscope
P. 61

Challenges for a data-driven society




           likely  from  ETSI  members  who  have  signed  the  CLA.   can  utilize  OSS,  the  strict  exclusion  of  OSS  code  in
           Reflecting on our analysis in section 3.2, if patents turn out   specifications  might  also  impede  full  utilization  of  OSS.
           to be essential, without clear guidance, Apache v.2, which   The power of code is likely to go up, since there are already
           directly  governs  the  OSM,  FRAND  will  prevail  and  such   questions  of  whether  the  industry  can  rely  only  on  open
           patent right will be made royalty free to any recipient that   source to define functions of future technologies instead of
           agrees to Apache v.2 in OSM.                       formulating a standard [36].  Nevertheless, there is no need
           Besides the possibility of rendering members’ patents to RF,   for SSOs to panic, as Updegrove said, “code [actually] has
           the  “patent  retaliation”  brings  more  concerns.  As  we   been creeping into standards for years, [but] often without
           learned,  contributors  have  to  agree  not  to  file  patent   the  keepers  of  intellectual  property  rights  policies
           litigation  against  the  “Work”  to  avoid  triggering  patent   governing the standards even being aware of it” [37]. What
           retaliation. However, as the project continues, the “Work”   matters  is  for  SSOs  to  realize  the  issue,  conceive  its  own
           will  grow  much  larger  than  it  was  when  first  contributed   goal, and design an optimum mode accordingly.
           and when the CLA was created. The current ToR did not
           provide  any  mechanism  to  monitor  the  continuing               REFERENCES
           contributions  to  the  project,  which  may  cause  uneasiness
           when  companies  decide  to  participate.  Perhaps  such   [1]   J. Erfanian et al., “Network Functions Virtualisation –
           uncertainty can explain the number of participants in OSM   White Paper on NFV priorities for 5G Network Functions
           at the time of this writing, with 65 companies having signed   [2]   Virtualisation (NFV),” Bilbao, Spain, 2017.
                                                                    B. Lundell and J. Gamalielsson, “On the potential for
           on  to  the  project,  32  of  which  are  ETSI  members.   improved standardisation through use of open source
           Considering  that  the  ETSI  has  over  800  members,  the   work practices in different standardisation organisations:
           current participating number is by no means high.        How can open source-projects contribute to development
                                                                    of IT-standards?,” in EURAS Proceedings, 2017, pp.
                  5. DISCUSSION AND  CONCLUSION                     137–155.
           As we summarized in Part 3, the current legal frameworks   [3]   ETSI, “Open Source impacts on ICT standardization,”
                                                                    2005.
           on  IPRs  licensing  of  SSOs,  including  the  ITU,  IEEE  and   [4]   J. P. Kesan, “The Fallacy of OSS Discrimination by
           ETSI, have shown gaps for OSS to fit in. By exploring the   FRAND Licensing  : An Empirical Analysis,” no. 10,
           ETSI OSM case, we further enriched our arguments.        2011.
           First  and  foremost,  although  consortia,  such  as  W3C  and   [5]   I. G. Mitchell QC and S. Mason, “Compatibility Of The
           OASIS, started similar processes, it was conducted mostly   Licensing Of Embedded Patents With Open Source
           in  industries  where  patents were  less  heavy.  For instance, an   Licensing Terms,” Int. Free Open Source Softw. Law
                                                                    Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–58, 2011.
           empirical  research  about  OASIS  showed  that  technical  committees  on
           telecommunication  sectors  were  among  the  two  that  opted  for  royalty   [6]   B. Lundell, J. Gamalielsson, and A. Katz, “On
           bearing  FRAND  commitment  other  than  RF  commitment  [30]    Implementation of Open Standards in Software: To What
           Considering  that  more  than  100,000  SEPs  have  been   Extent Can ISO Standards be Implemented in Open
           declared  in  the  ETSI  under  FRAND  commitments  [35],   Source Software?,” Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res., vol. 13,
           OSM is a pioneering step that other formal SSOs can learn   no. 1, pp. 47–73, 2016.
           from.                                              [7]   ITU, “Joint ITU-NGMN Alliance Workshop ‘Open
                                                                    Source and Standards for 5G,’” 2016. [Online]. Available:
           Secondly,  the  ToR  presents  the  ETSI’s  awareness  to   http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/Workshops-and-
           address  some  of  the  tensions  we  described  in  Part  3.  It   Seminars/itu-ngmn/Pages/default.aspx. [Accessed: 27-
           clarifies  the  goal  of  hosting  the  OSM,  which  leads  to  a   Sep-2017].
           clearer  scope  of  application  of  ETSI  IPRs  policy  (e.g.   [8]   ANSI, “Open Source, Open Standards, Open Minds:
           FRAND  commitment  and  the  software  guidelines),  thus   ANSI Announces Free Event on April 15 in Washington,
           removing some tensions such as in the direct use of cunning   DC,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
                                                                    https://www.ansi.org/news_publications/news_story?men
           code.  This  in  turn  confirms  our  hypothesis  on  potential   uid=7&articleid=2da23a16-f02e-40cc-81bf-
           tensions if we only rely on the existing framework.      7bd0cfdd0bfb. [Accessed: 27-Sep-2017].
           Secondly, we found out that ETSI members might still have   [9]   “ETSI - Workshop on Open source and standardization:
           a  reason  for  concern  as  the  project  develops.  Without  a   legal interactions,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
           clear guidance on the priority of FRAND and Apache v.2,   http://www.etsi.org/news-events/events/1114-workshop-
           there is a chance for making patents embedded in standards   on-open-source-and-standardization-legal-interactions.
           free from royalty charges to a “Work” that is too large to be   [Accessed: 31-Mar-2017].
           controlled.  One  goal  of  the  ETSI  is    “seeking  a  balance   [10]   “OSM.” [Online]. Available: https://osm.etsi.org/.
                                                                    [Accessed: 18-Apr-2017].
           between the needs of standardization for public use … and   [11]   OSI, “Open Source Licenses by Category.” [Online].
           the  right  of  the  owners  of  IPRs”  [16],  which  may  need   Available: https://opensource.org/licenses/category.
           further consideration. Besides, other open source projects,   [Accessed: 27-Sep-2017].
           e.g., OOCRAN under AGPL (as of this writing) may also  [12]   K. Krechmer, “Cathedrals, Libraries and Bazaars.”
           contribute  implementations  to  ETSI  MANO.  Such       Association of Computing Machinery (ACM)
           ambiguity is by no means an ideal circumstance.          Symposium on Applied Computing SAC, Marid, 2002.
           Further, although the ETSI sets an example of how SSOs   [13]   ITU, “Understanding patents, competition &
                                                                    standardization in an interconnected world,” 2014.
                                                              [14]   E. Raymond, “The cathedral and the bazaar,” First
                                                                    Monday, vol. 2, no. SPEC, pp. 1–40, 2005.



                                                          – 45 –
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66