Page 61 - ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services – Recommendations
P. 61

ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services
                                                      Recommendations







                Title of recommendation       Regulatory harmonization for all financial products
                Working Group                 Consumer Experience and Protection

                Theme                         General framework
                Audience for recommendation   Regulators





                Regulators should work individually and in collaboration with one another to harmonize coverage of different
                DFS provider types, and ensure consumer protection provisions apply to all financial products provided digitally.
                Regulations should require that consumer protection for DFS consumers is not inferior to that of consumers in
                the traditional banking sector.


               Regulators should consider the unique characteristics of DFS – such as the use of agents, reliance on a technology
               interface, and longer and more complex value chains – in their approach to consumer protection. According
               to Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) , key DFS consumer risks include: Trouble completing a
                                                         10
               transaction due to network/service downtime; insufficient agent liquidity or float, which also affects ability
               to transact; complex or confusing user interfaces; digital recourse issues; lack of transparent fees and other
               terms; fraud; and data privacy and protection concerns.
               The increased number of entities involved in delivering DFS may elevate these risks and create gaps in oversight
               and accountability. For example, liability for the loss of customer funds due to fraud or mishandling may be
               unclear due to the involvement of several parties (including agents) delivering the service. New players and
               partnerships that deliver DFS may be subject to diverse forms of regulation and supervision, such as those
               governing banking, payments, telecommunications, and insurance.
               Consumer protection rules need to specifically address DFS risks and be harmonized across different DFS
               provider types to avoid gaps and inferior treatment for digital versus non-DFS. Guidelines for E-Money Issuers
               in Ghana   obligate e-money issuers to fully adhere to any rules issued by the Bank of Ghana pertaining
                       11
               to consumer protection as well as such basic principles of consumer protection as: Equitable, honest, and
               fair treatment of all customers; transparency and disclosure of clear, sufficient, and timely information on
               the fundamental benefits, risks, and terms of any product or service offered in an objective and accessible
               form; sufficient and accessible information to customers on their rights and responsibilities; protection of
               customers’ privacy; responsible business conduct of all staff and agents; and adequate systems and processes
               for complaints handling and redress.

               Regulators’ licensing procedures should ensure that DFS providers are subject to clear and enforceable rules
               that protect customer funds from loss due to a provider’s insolvency, fraud, or other operational risks. One
               option is to require DFS providers to operate under the license of one regulator even if some services fall under
               the purview of more than one authority, an approach recommended  by the Alliance for Financial Inclusion
                                                                         12
               (AFI). Regardless of how regulation and oversight are allocated, the roles, responsibilities, and information
               sharing rights and obligations of all participants should be clearly defined in regulations and interagency
               memorandums of understanding. This is in line with the G20 High-Level Principles  on Financial Consumer
                                                                                     13



               10   McKee, K., Kaffenberger, M., and Zimmerman, J.M. (2015), Doing Digital Finance Right: The Case for Stronger Mitigation of Cus-
                  tomer Risks.  http:// www. cgap. org/ sites/ default/ files/ Focus- Note- Doing- Digital- Finance- Right- Jun- 2015. pdf
               11   Guidelines for E-Money Issuers in Ghana (2015) https:// www. bog. gov. gh/ privatecontent/ Banking/ E- MONEY%20 GUIDELINES- 29-
                  06- 2015- UPDATED5. pdf
               12   Mobile Financial Services Consumer Protection in Mobile Financial Services (2014), http:// www. afi- global. org/ sites/ default/ files/
                  publications/ mfswg_ guideline_ note_ 7_ consumer_ protection_ in_ mfs. pdf
               13   G20 High-Level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection  (2011) https:// www. oecd. org/ g20/ topics/ financial- sector- reform/
                  48892010. pdf



                                                                                                       55
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66